Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-11-2018, 09:49 AM
 
19,573 posts, read 8,524,460 times
Reputation: 10096

Advertisements

This is a great idea. If someone does not vote over a two-year period in Ohio, they are sent a confirmation notice to make sure they are still around and alive and kicking. If they do not respond, and they do not vote after another two years, they are removed from the voter roles.

The Supreme Court affirmed this practice today in Washington.

Quote:
Supreme Court rules in favor of Ohio 'voter purge'

In a 5-4 decision, the court’s majority said the practice, known as the “supplemental process,” does not violate the National Voter Registration Act, which bars states from removing the names of people from the voter rolls for failing to vote.The court's five conservative justices voted in the majority, with the court's four liberals dissenting.

Under the supplemental process, voters who have not voted in two years are flagged and sent a confirmation notice. Voters who then fail to respond to the notice and fail to vote within the next two years are removed from the rolls.
Who wants to be first to claim that voters who do not vote are being disenfranchised from voting. Anyone?

Also, six other states have similar laws, including Georgia, Montana, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania and West Virginia. Surely this list will grow after this decision.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-11-2018, 09:50 AM
 
9,617 posts, read 6,066,951 times
Reputation: 3884
Talking Supreme Court Upholds Ohio Voter Roll Purge Law, 5-4

Conservative Justice’s voted, 5 to uphold Ohio’s law as Constitutional. Here are the common sense basics of Ohio’s law.

Quote:
Under Ohio's policy, if registered voters miss voting for two years, they are sent registration confirmation notices. If they do not respond and do not vote over the following four years, they are removed from the rolls.
One more piece of former President Obama’s legacy consigned to the trash bins.

Quote:
Republican President Donald Trump's administration backed Ohio in the case, reversing a stance taken by Democratic former President Barack Obama's administration against the policy.
http://https://www.cnbc.com/2018/06/...ge-policy.html

Janus decision still to come.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-11-2018, 09:52 AM
 
9,617 posts, read 6,066,951 times
Reputation: 3884
Sorry about that, Sparty. We must have been spreading the good news at the same time.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-11-2018, 09:53 AM
JPD
 
12,138 posts, read 18,300,835 times
Reputation: 8004
Quote:
Originally Posted by earthlyfather View Post


One more piece of former President Obama’s legacy consigned to the trash bins.
Obama's legacy? Never in American history, until now, has there been a use it or lose it clause attached to the right to vote.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-11-2018, 09:53 AM
 
19,573 posts, read 8,524,460 times
Reputation: 10096
Quote:
Originally Posted by earthlyfather View Post
Sorry about that, Sparty. We must have been spreading the good news at the same time.

I sent them a note. I beat you by 1 minute.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-11-2018, 09:55 AM
JPD
 
12,138 posts, read 18,300,835 times
Reputation: 8004
Would you be willing to attach a use it or lose it clause to the 2nd Amendment?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-11-2018, 09:55 AM
 
16,604 posts, read 8,619,550 times
Reputation: 19435
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spartacus713 View Post
This is a great idea. If someone does not vote over a two-year period in Ohio, they are sent a confirmation notice to make sure they are still around and alive and kicking. If they do not respond, and they do not vote after another two years, they are removed from the voter roles.

The Supreme Court affirmed this practice today in Washington.

Who wants to be first to claim that voters who do not vote are being disenfranchised from voting. Anyone?

Also, six other states have similar laws, including Georgia, Montana, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania and West Virginia. Surely this list will grow after this decision.
Rest assured they will be along, with the same convoluted nonsense regarding ID being needed to vote is disenfranchising.


`
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-11-2018, 09:55 AM
 
Location: Texas
37,949 posts, read 17,875,145 times
Reputation: 10371
"Under Ohio's policy, if registered voters miss voting for two years, they are sent registration confirmation notices. If they do not respond and do not vote over the following four years, they are removed from the rolls.

The challengers said Ohio's policy illegally erased thousands of voters from registration rolls in 2015 alone and disproportionately impacted racial minorities and poor people who tend to back Democratic candidates."

The article never explained how it disproportionately impacted racial minorities and poor people

https://www.cnbc.com/2018/06/11/supr...ge-policy.html

btw your link had an extra http in it
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-11-2018, 09:57 AM
 
Location: Texas
37,949 posts, read 17,875,145 times
Reputation: 10371
Quote:
Originally Posted by JPD View Post
Obama's legacy? Never in American history, until now, has there been a use it or lose it clause attached to the right to vote.
No one has lost the right to vote. That's what matters.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-11-2018, 09:57 AM
 
45,585 posts, read 27,203,264 times
Reputation: 23898
I understand this... I would lengthen it out a bit... maybe have it cover two presidential cycles.

Life happens sometimes, and two years is too short of a period of time.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:18 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top