Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
- There were 27 investigations into Hillary Clinton
- 134 FBI agents confirmed to have worked on the various investigations, with those spending over 10,000 hours investigating her, collectively.
- It is estimated that the FBI alone (not counting the State Dept & Justice Dept) spent about $21M of federal tax money investigating Hillary Clinton.
If any City-Data supporters who supported the Hillary investigations oppose the Muller investigation, they are hypocrites. For the record, I do not believe Hillary is a trustworthy person and would have hated her as president, but any unbiased, informed person is well aware that the countless investigations into Benghazi were a waste of taxpayer funds.
"but any unbiased, informed person is well aware that the countless investigations into Benghazi were a waste of taxpayer funds"
Any intelligent person would know this how Congress works.
There are MULTIPLE Congressional committed which have oversight responsibility.
Many of these issues overlap committees
Many actions fall under these various committees responsibility.
You act as if this is the 1st time it has happened.
It is NOT.
It happens ALL THE TIME.
"There were 27 investigations into Hillary Clinton", Which one were NOT legitimate?
" 134 FBI agents confirmed to have worked on the various investigations, with those spending over 10,000 hours investigating her, collectively.
- It is estimated that the FBI alone (not counting the State Dept & Justice Dept) spent about $21M of federal tax money investigating Hillary Clinton."
And they PROVED that the attack on Benghazi was NOT because of some rarely seen video.
They PROVED hillary broke MULTIPLE laws and comey decided NOT to recoment chargesw being filed against her.
I know many people who worked for th FBI and even THY are mad at he likes of comey, mueller, reosensrtein, stroc et,. for casting such a black shadow over the entire agency when most of know it is NOT ALL of the FBI but only a few in very high positions with the power to do what they want.
Last edited by Quick Enough; 07-04-2018 at 05:42 AM..
Trey, of course, hasn’t bothered to investigate Russian interference
Hence 7 to 0
Pathetic
What is pathetic is the lengths the libs go to in order to defend hillary
Yep NOTHING, oh wait, except for:
https://asweetdoseofreality.com/2016...lary-off-hook/
Quote: Gowdy: Good morning, Director Comey. Secretary Clinton said she never sent or received any classified information over her private e-mail, was that true? Comey: Our investigation found that there was classified information sent.
Gowdy: It was not true?
Comey: That’s what I said. Gowdy: OK. Well, I’m looking for a shorter answer so you and I are not here quite as long. Secretary Clinton said there was nothing marked classified on her e-mails sent or received. Was that true?
Comey: That’s not true. There were a small number of portion markings on I think three of the documents. Gowdy: Secretary Clinton said “I did not e-mail any classified information to anyone on my e-mail there was no classified material.” That is true?
Comey: There was classified information emailed. Gowdy: Secretary Clinton used one device, was that true? Comey: She used multiple devices during the four years of her term as Secretary of State. Gowdy: Secretary Clinton said all work related emails were returned to the State Department. Was that true?
Comey: No. We found work related email, thousands, that were not returned. Gowdy: Secretary Clinton said neither she or anyone else deleted work related emails from her personal account. Comey: That’s a harder one to answer. We found traces of work related emails in — on devices or in space. Whether they were deleted or when a server was changed out something happened to them, there’s no doubt that the work related emails that were removed electronically from the email system. Gowdy: Secretary Clinton said her lawyers read every one of the emails and were overly inclusive. Did her lawyers read the email content individually? Comey: No.
I would say that the investigation is still ongoing, but you're well aware of that. And unlike Trump's White House, Mueller's team doesn't have any leakers.
I've subscribed to this thread though, so when the Mueller investigation is over and his report becomes public, I can quote you and post a link to what he's found.
"Mueller's team doesn't have any leakers."
I have noticed EVERYTHING that has leaked out abort the "Russian collusion " story has been NEGATIVE toward Trump and NOT 1 SINGLE THING POSITIVE.
"That said - you never did say who you would like to see replace Mueller and Rosenstein"
I did, you admit to NOT reading it.
We are NOT allowed to post entire articles.
The details ARE in the article showing the long time connections of the 3 Amigos and the Clinton's.
If you think the facts in the article are wrong just because Roger stone wrote it, then PROVE what he said in the article IS WRONG.
If you are going to make a claim, it is up to YOU to back it up.
You attack the messenger and are afraid of actually LOOKING at the message.
The messenger is under investigation by the subject of his article, making him highly suspect as to his ability to be impartial when discussing the matter. I'm not in the least afraid of Stone or forty more like him, unless it is the fear of being smothered in bull****.
I still haven't heard who it is that should replace them, and if the answer is in the article, I'll remain ignorant, thanks. If you would like to reveal which candidates you have in mind, we can go from there.
Instead, please present ANY evidence that Mueller or Rosentein has “invented” evidence against Manafort, Flynn etc. etc. etc.
Quick, we’re STILL WAITING for evidence that Mueller/Rosenstein “invented” evidence....still looking Quick?!
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
