Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-22-2018, 07:55 AM
exm
 
3,722 posts, read 1,784,010 times
Reputation: 2850

Advertisements

It's amazing that there's a deep state conspiracy trying to overthrown an elected President, and the dems are more concerned about fake collusion and obstruction.


What I wonder is what if the tables are turned? What if there's a President Biden in 2020 and we learn that the DOJ and FBI are trying to oust Biden, and if the AG appoints a special counsel to look into a fake crime? I mean, take off your Trump-hatred hat and imagine if this all would happen to a President you happen to support. Unreal.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-22-2018, 09:00 AM
 
Location: sumter
12,970 posts, read 9,666,867 times
Reputation: 10432
Quote:
Originally Posted by Troyfan View Post
This could be an example of a false story put out to influence the upcoming elections, as the NYT warned us of. Or it could be evidence of an attempted coup and further evidence of the FBI's and DOJ's politicization.

But it is one or the other.
A false story they warned us of, but yet they would put out a false story knowing it's false.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-22-2018, 11:08 AM
 
21,952 posts, read 9,522,996 times
Reputation: 19477
Quote:
Originally Posted by exm View Post
and the dems are more concerned about fake collusion and obstruction.

.
They aren't 'concerned'. Its a COVER UP.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-22-2018, 11:21 AM
 
Location: NJ/NY
18,472 posts, read 15,262,903 times
Reputation: 14342
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ringo1 View Post
It appears to be that this was leaked by a member of the Trump camp to give him a reason to fire Rosenstein.

The timing is quite suspicious.
I cant help but laugh, reading you guys posting this theory.

Just a few weeks ago, from a lot of the same posters, I was reading about what a rigorous and thorough vetting process the NYT has. Lol.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-22-2018, 11:21 AM
 
Location: United States
12,391 posts, read 7,103,495 times
Reputation: 6135
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ringo1 View Post
It appears to be that this was leaked by a member of the Trump camp to give him a reason to fire Rosenstein.

The timing is quite suspicious.
Very doubtful.

Its almost certain that Trump isn't going to fire Rosenstein any time soon, so there is no motivation to attack Rosenstein now.

And it fact...

Trump appears to have made a deal with Rosenstein to turn over material to the IG that would be negative for McCabe.

Its much more likely it was McCabe that leaked his memos to the NYT to attack Rosenstein.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-22-2018, 11:36 AM
 
19,845 posts, read 12,116,680 times
Reputation: 17579
Quote:
Originally Posted by stburr91 View Post
Very doubtful.

Its almost certain that Trump isn't going to fire Rosenstein any time soon, so there is no motivation to attack Rosenstein now.

And it fact...

Trump appears to have made a deal with Rosenstein to turn over material to the IG that would be negative for McCabe.

Its much more likely it was McCabe that leaked his memos to the NYT to attack Rosenstein.

Agreed, especially with the bolded. They might be hoping Trump fires Rosenstein.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-22-2018, 11:43 AM
 
Location: 500 miles from home
33,942 posts, read 22,544,846 times
Reputation: 25816
Quote:
Originally Posted by AnesthesiaMD View Post
I cant help but laugh, reading you guys posting this theory.

Just a few weeks ago, from a lot of the same posters, I was reading about what a rigorous and thorough vetting process the NYT has. Lol.
The 'Failing New York Times'? Isn't that what Trump and Cult 45 call it?

Or course there is always the ever popular 'Mexican owned Blog" as frequently referenced by one of CD's most prolific pro-Trump posters.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-22-2018, 12:16 PM
 
26,694 posts, read 14,579,129 times
Reputation: 8094
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ringo1 View Post
The 'Failing New York Times'? Isn't that what Trump and Cult 45 call it?

Or course there is always the ever popular 'Mexican owned Blog" as frequently referenced by one of CD's most prolific pro-Trump posters.
Two questions:

1. Did Rod say that?
2. If he did, how would that be acceptable to anybody?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-22-2018, 12:29 PM
 
4,559 posts, read 1,439,314 times
Reputation: 1919
Quote:
Originally Posted by lifeexplorer View Post
Two questions:

1. Did Rod say that?
2. If he did, how would that be acceptable to anybody?
Not as bad as....half the stuff trump says " in jest",
" awe thats just locker Room talk", " boys being boys",

It proves Rosenstein is fighting hurdles indeed.
McCabe was a patriot cannon.
Rosenstein won't jeopardize democracy no matter how evil the target to be neutralized.
Slow and steady and by the rule of our country's laws will the battle and war be won.
His and Muellers actions can be counted on as credible.
Then, put them on the 2020 Ticket , together.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-22-2018, 12:52 PM
 
26,694 posts, read 14,579,129 times
Reputation: 8094
Quote:
Originally Posted by what'd i miss View Post
Not as bad as....half the stuff trump says " in jest",
" awe thats just locker Room talk", " boys being boys",

It proves Rosenstein is fighting hurdles indeed.
McCabe was a patriot cannon.
Rosenstein won't jeopardize democracy no matter how evil the target to be neutralized.
Slow and steady and by the rule of our country's laws will the battle and war be won.
His and Muellers actions can be counted on as credible.
Then, put them on the 2020 Ticket , together.
Would you say the same thing if the President is Obama?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:49 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top