Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
This is f'ing awful. I don't support Kavanaugh but not because of the assault claims. This is the kind of crap that makes women look bad. It also makes Democrats look bad if they support this route. I'm not a D but it's the poison I usually pick because of some main issues that matter the most to me.
Edit: Why can't I find this anywhere but Fox? I defeintely don't support this attitude, but I want to see more proof that this is a pervasive sentiment before condemning anyone. If this is just another right wing disinformation tactic, it's really going to anger me. I'm so sick of this partisan bs.
Quote:
Originally Posted by EveryLady
Curious, I looked too - on the Women's March website and thru a bunch of their twitter feed. And nothing.
Their logo sure has been copied ... probably a fake meme. These are the organizations that support the Women's March and the few I recognize ... well never say never ... but put me down as a disbeliever:
Planned Parenthood Action Fund • Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights • Women's March • NARAL Pro-Choice America • United State of Women • Sierra Club • Feminist Majority • National Women’s Law Center • Center for Popular Democracy Action • Advocates for Youth • NAACP • NDWA • MoveOn • Alliance for Justice Action Campaign • MomsRising • Credo Action • #VOTEPROCHOICE • Indivisible • UltraViolet Action.
Earlier, some of the stuff being repeated about Ford was clearly fake, from 4chan and the like.
Interesting times we live in, for sure.
Both of you, it is from the official Women’s March twitter feed. You could have just clicked on the embeded tweet and gone there. Conversely you can go to their twitter account @womensmarch to see it. Several posts down but it is there.
So apparently Ford's lawyers are saying she had more "evidence" to offer in the form of answers to questions. That's not evidence. I was going to ask how these people earned the law degrees. However, I realize by just saying certain phrased like "Evidence to offer" regardless if it's viable or not these people, Ford, and her Clinton backed lawyers are preying on the lowest common dominator of people who are of low IQ and easily manipulated at being used for agendas.
Ford still will not release her therapist notes, she stated she will only release if interviewed by the FBI.
This is someone who is just looking for delay tactics, if she truly was a victim, she would have shoved everything she had to them, not withhold and attach conditions, like she did with her testimony.
Yes. I agree. Not fair to say its just a tactic. Its just an.obviously glaring character flaw unless your Hatch, Grassley, Trump , Graham, and Jeff Flake currently.
This Ford woman was a tactic - she had nothing.
And neither did anyone else who she swore was there. Including her BFF.
Both of you, it is from the official Women’s March twitter feed. You could have just clicked on the embeded tweet and gone there. Conversely you can go to their twitter account @womensmarch to see it. Several posts down but it is there.
Okay ... I don't do twitter ... but if you go to: https://twitter.com/hashtag/CancelKavanaugh?src=hash
there's nothing if I scroll for about 2 minutes ... with nothing particularly crazy on their website ... plus, I don't know who puts stuff on various twitter feeds ...
sure there's the embedded tweet that's a standalone ... wait, I got into the womensmarch hashtag ... it's there.
That's crazy. Unacceptable. Please don't sign me up.
I have not been following this at all. This thread is the first time I read about this person/nominee. I read up on this a little bit. It appears that center of the controversy was some woman accused him of sexual misconduct. Then I remember that Clarence Thomas was accused of the same thing. Arnold Schwarzenegger was also accused of molesting women when he ran for governor. Accusation of sexual abuse seems to be the weapon choice in high profile positions.
36 yrs ago, accused of groping a 15 yr old girl when he was 17 at a party. All 4 of her witnesses say it never happened, were not at a party with her, she doesnt know month it happened, or where it happened, or how she got home. It was a bs political ploy to delay confirmation until after midterms.
Would have happened no matter who was nominated.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
