Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Obama had that privilege to get away with anything and everything. He went to a racist and anti-American church for 20 years. That would've sunk any white candidate and should've sunk him right there, as it turned out later as President he acted with that racial bias.
It's not about the beer. It IS about his harsh demeanor, belligerent temper and lying under oath to Senate committee.
So drag the guy through the mud, embarrass and humiliate his family and kids, aggressively question him after his accuser got treated with kid gloves....
And then say he's unqualified because he got mad about it..
And you have no proof that he lied about anything.
Just like you have no proof about any of the accusations leveled against him
It's not about the beer. It IS about his harsh demeanor, belligerent temper and lying under oath to Senate committee.
Obama did that and got a second term. WTH
But underneath that aloof exterior lurks a hot temper and foul mouth capable of hurling obscenities, according to someone who knows him very well.
In the new book, “Believer: My Forty Years in Politics,” former Obama strategist David Axelrod reveals how the president once viciously chewed him out as he was preparing Obama for his 2012 debate with Republican nominee Mitt Romney.
“Motherf—-r’s never happy,” Obama said, according to Axelrod, before tearing out of the room.
Enjoying a beer is not the problem. Not knowing when to stop drinking and becoming belligerent is the problem. Also, I can't see a cry baby on the Supreme Court. He will have to make tough choices as a Supreme Court judge, do you think he is up to that task?
It's not about the beer. It IS about his harsh demeanor, belligerent temper and lying under oath to Senate committee.
We aren't talking about Hillary.
To the OP: "How is a SCOTUS judge who enjoys beer a national disaster but a POTUS who admitted to doing cocaine was no big deal?"
Because that's so yesterday. They've moved on from the beer and are now going after how he acted while in the hearing, using dramatic words like "screaming" and "sobbing" and "raging" and other such nonsense. Give if a few days, they'll come up with something else when they realize that plan isn't working, either.
This isn't about enjoying a beer. I'm not buying you don't know that.
The other guy didn't lie about doing cocaine.
And "enjoying beer" IS no big deal. Look who's in the White House. He's been accused of enjoying lots of beer.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
