Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Both yet the obsession with the Clintons and Obamas continue. Their leader provides enough breaking news to keep their attention.
Well, when something of actual substance comes up about Trump, we will mention it, until then, Hilly the 2 time loser and Barry Storeo keep clambering for the limelight..
I thought it was the same guys doing the digging. Are FBI agents assigned to investigate only those they
agree with?
Nope. Dept of State clearances are conducted by the Diplomatic Security Services, not the FBI. The DSS agents simply investigate the backgrounds as they are, but when these TS-SCI clearance investigation reports (TS-SCI, such as Hillary had) start getting pushed up the chain, it starts getting political.
Without top down pressure from a friendly left wing regime, no doubt Hillary did not want this process being conducted. They go back 10 years minimum, further if they start pulling threads that require it. Think of Hillary and her conduct in the last 10 years. Orange jumpsuit time. Not doing a fresh background investigation now is to her advantage.
Last edited by snebarekim; 10-13-2018 at 11:44 AM..
What about Amal Clooney, oops, I meant Uma Abedin. Does she have her clearance still?
Grassley's letter released Cheryl Mills name, but redacted the other four 'researchers' names. If Huma and other staff are the other four, why redact their names, but not Mills. I'm not wearing my tin foil hat yet, but it's nearby.
Let's cut out all of Chuck's twisting and dodging and lift out the one actual statement that is pertinent.
But that's not what you claimed, Chuck. You flatly stated that the President does not revoke security clearances. Full stop.
The President of the United States himself, in a statement issued from his White House and read out loud by his press secretary during a press briefing, explicitly stated that he, President Trump, revoked the security clearance of John Brennan, former Director of the CIA.
So one of you must therefore be lying.
Chuck, are you calling the President of the United States a liar?
I've called him a liar before....what's your point..nothing got it....
Still waiting for all these threads showing where I use that phrase.....are you lying?
I'm absolutely amazed. Trump is such a petty, vindictive guy that I'm surprised he didn't do that the first day he was in office.
Sorry, but even though Clinton managed to get through both having improper emails on an insecure private server and strange happenings in Bin Ghazi unscathed, I think there's more than enough evidence to at least support removing her security clearance. It's fairly obvious just from the email debacle that she shouldn't be trusted with classified information. I would think we could all agree on that. But probably not.
she was disgraced back then. Time has passed, she'll get it back when she becomes a candidate next year.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Both yet the obsession with the Clintons and Obamas continue. Their leader provides enough breaking news to keep their attention.
Please explain
