Quote:
Originally Posted by magaalot
Its always considered 'sexist' to call a woman a name like horseface because women are obsessed with their own physical appearance.
Men don't take themselves as seriously, so its ok for people to tease Trump about his appearance, and for newspaper comics to draw Trump in an unflattering way and for talk show hosts to make fun of Trump's hair etc.
Women are simply too vain and materialistic, unable to take it when people make fun of their appearance.
Trump is just giving women equal opportunity, and seeing if they want it, which I guess they don't.
|
Wow. Yes, let's put
more blame upon the females,
this time for
how they may be insulted on their looks.
For one thing, since some are still unaware of it,
advertisers have been
projecting upon females forever, to maintain or improve upon their appearance, to be slender,
maintain youthfulness, be perfect-looking, sexy, "hot". Over time, whether having tuned it out or
not, the message exists, and can be absorbed, wearing away at a woman's self-esteem, the
message being that a woman has to
keep trying harder, keep having it in the backs of their minds to
work at it. Absurdly, it is focused upon how females' looks have more value than other positive traits. If a woman wouldn't
try, she could be subject to the kinds of demeaning name calling referenced. (All of which, by the year 2018, should be something not to have remained).
Some males will say, "Just don't look at those ads", "Don't buy magazines", "Just don't give into that" or "Women only do this to impress other women"
when the message is
everywhere and always has been. Young girls have increasingly become affected by this, wanting breast enlargements, facial surgeries, etc. It's ridiculous. Of course
men do not relate, since
they are not targeted in the same way or degree (and don't begin telling me they
do, except for the occasional balding or workout ad, a few personal products - which will never even come
close to what women purchase or endure to maintain themselves, even if minimally). Men will feel more confident, since men are
not targeted all their lives to "appear perfect". (It doesn't help that "entertainment for men" involves a certain woman's physique or looks that men may base their interests upon).
Women are aware that
some men (having been taught to), may stoop to referring to women as "pigs", "dogs", "dykes", "slobs"...if one is not in tip-top shape. The funny thing being, this is likely done by men whom are quite unappealing themselves - just as your president, himself. This is not something commonly done by females towards men, and is not right anyway you look at it. It's a certain mentality or being Misogynistic. And
that is what this is about. Women are already physically under the gun, then to be outwardly criticized as is done by your leader, not only sets a lousy, unneccessary and childish example, but is inappropriate for any grown man or
president to be doing. (This is not offering women an "equal opportunity", either).
He is
already proven himself to be an insult to America, the world and the office of presidency without stooping to call others names (having been towards men, also), which he
does out of retaliation, to boost himself he thinks, but only
indicates how weak he is. HE has ended up criticized for
his appearance, lack of ability and more due to his
appalling demeanor and behavior, which he has brought upon
himself.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
