Federal Court Finds California Magazine Ban Violates the Second Amendment (carry, good news)

[Floorist]

Originally Posted by rbohm

you are not the sharpest knife in the drawer, but you seem to forget that court have ruled that restricting ammunition is a poor effort to circumvent the constitution, and thus it is UNCONSTITUTIONAL to do so.





i am surprised that no one has challenged the AGs authority to make laws and circumvent the legislative body in the state.

No kidding, her ruling has to be unconstitutional.

[1AngryTaxPayer]

It could very well.

What we know it did for sure is erase 20 years of work by the anti-gunners. Every single mag bought, brought in, created etc just got a massive reset button. AG freaking out that an additional 1 million magazines are heading into CA.

[1AngryTaxPayer]

So the window has closed for now but it's a massive reset button for millions of people that had to hide their magazines.

[atltechdude]

No one needs a 30 round mag.

[rebeldor]

Originally Posted by atltechdude

No one needs a 30 round mag.

You don't get to decide what other people need.

[ncguy50]

Originally Posted by atltechdude

No one needs a 30 round mag.

Who are you to tell me what I need, comrade authoritarian?

[westcoastforme]

Originally Posted by atltechdude

No one needs a 30 round mag.

I’ve got 30 round mags. 40 round mags.

33 round glock mags

17 round mags

Tons of 15 and 16 round mags

3 pistols 2 rifles


And.......


12,000 rounds of ammo

[1AngryTaxPayer]

Brownells had 50 round drums for .308 on sale for less than 100 bucks!!!! Got em!! Now the .308 weighs twenty pounds

[Roboteer]

Originally Posted by TheGoodTheBadTheUgly

So does this rejection of the ban go country wide?

As soon as the Supremes affirm it.

[Vf6cruiser]

They will appeal this to rescind the ruling to the 9th clown circus court of Newsomville........then it will go to the Supremes