Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
You mean take away an American citizen's constitutional right to bear arms because the former president of Peru shot himself?
That is beyond retarded.
The average American citizen that owns guns didn't shoot anyone either and there are those who would take their constitutional right to bear arms away and jail them if they resist.
Safety first !!! If you see something say something. OK
Obama has never been a leader but he might follow the example of the former president of Peru.
As the investigation of the investigators heats up the "walls are closing in" on Obama.
The average American citizen that owns guns didn't shoot anyone either and there are those who would take their constitutional right to bear arms away and jail them if they resist.
So because there are people who want to take away the constitutional right to bear arms from gun owners who haven't shot anyone, we should take away this right from Obama because the former president of Peru shot himself?
That doesn't make sense. Don't tread on my constitution!
Quote:
Originally Posted by phma
Obama has never been a leader but he might follow the example of the former president of Peru.
So to be clear you believe that if anyone thinks another citizen might shoot himself while in the process of being arrested, we should take away their constitutional right to bear arms? You're basically advocating:
1. No more due process or burden of evidence
2. Seizing weapons from citizens based on presumption of future crime
3. The actions of the president of Peru should be used to set precedent in US criminal code
You're quite the gun grabber, we should respect the second amendment instead of bowing to those who wish to seize guns from the citizens like you do.
Good luck finding any logic or reasoning in this or any other of these nutball threads.
That statement could apply to the democrat platform.
However before us is this thread are specific issues connecting safety first gun policy and the Red Flag position of harmony. If there is any doubt its best to remove, without due process, a citizens rights, is the current thinking.
I wouldn't say Obama is retarded but the retarded do follow him and we don't want an epidemic of new gun violence.
Safety first !!!
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
If you see something say something. OK 
