Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
The Supreme Court rejected a case Monday brought by an atheist who wanted to scrub “In God We Trust,” the U.S. motto, from the nation’s currency, claiming it was an entanglement of state and religion.
Michael Newdow, an activist who previous challenged reciting the Pledge of Allegiance in schools, had set his sights on money, but lost at the district, circuit and now Supreme Court levels.
On behalf of a group of atheists, Mr. Newdow argued America’s money lacked an reference to God until 1864, when it was added in. He said that amounted to an endorsement of religion.
The justices rejected his petition without comment.
Funny, I was wondering when someone would challenge the money.
The court won't touch that one!
Why not? The court has not had any qualms about removing 10 commandments from certain locations (and upsetting many in the process), why would a statement on currency be any different?
Christian Right people will simply still have to handle money used by such great sinners as prostitutes and child molesters. I doubt they mind all that much.
Thank you President Trump for nomination Judge's who rule on the Constitution and NOT by political emotion.
The Constitution does not say anything about the wording on money.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.