Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I have never, since day one, ever believed two planes brought those towers down.
They were imploded just like any other building that is taken down , to construct a new one.
Take a look at any videos of an imploded building,(Las Vegas would be a good place to start your video search) and the effect is exactly the same as the two towers.
If any of you were around in 1993, when the foundations of the towers were bombed, you should be aware the buildings remained standing.
From 1993 to 2001, I believe those two buildings were wired to implode.
That is a long time for terrorist(disguised as ordinary construction workers) to blend in while they went about their business of wiring the building, unsuspected.
I believe they used the planes just as they did, to make it look like the planes caused the destruction, when in fact the buildings were imploded.
It was a terrorist plot that worked, and again, they had years to formulate, and carry out the plan.
I found it odd, that years before, the foundations, holding up the buildings, were bombed, and yet the buildings still stood, but a plane hitting in the upper regions of the towers caused them to collapse.
I will go to my grave believing they were wired to implode, which is exactly what they did.
Bob.
SPOT ON - Also all those Hollywood actors running for their lives, fake blood and the avatar computer generated firemen and all 1st res ponders. Totally fake. Most likely created in Florida or somewhere where the weather was perfect so after the filming they could have a cocktail on the beach.
What difference does it make?
Let's see the the NYT has no problem making sure we all no a mass shooter was a white male. They don't say "bullets took aim and brought people down."
If a black church is burned they don't say "Gasoline took aim and burned a church down."
No, they make it a point to identify the villain and nail the details as long as it is within their agenda.
This is right there with Omar saying "somebody did something." This to describe the senseless targeting and murder of nearly 3000 unarmed innocent civilians.
We aren't talking about a bomb going astray, or even a rogue soldier killing a few civilians. We are talking about a terrorist attack committed by Muslim terrorists. Why should it be so painful to call it what it is?
Writing something like "The 2700+ people in the Twin Towers area were tragically killed by two airplanes that were used in an act of terrorism" might have been more appropriate to headline.
Seems about right for the NYT. They can't blame Muslims-they blame the airplane. Much like they can't blame criminals for murder-they blame guns. It's hard to believe just how delusional those on the left have become.
“Muslims”?
Should Japanese remember Hiroshima and Nagasaki and their newspaper blame “Christians”?
By the way, sears Towers was designed by a “Muslim”.
As sad and tragic as this horrific event was, the idiocy in your post is remarkable.
And while you are at it, also remember, “Pull it” on 9/11.
Quick google of articles by the NYT and they clearly talk about nearly 3,000 killed, terrorists, etc.
If you are suggesting media tries to influence via their tweets -- and then ignore the actual articles of the media outlet -- you are selectively choosing to edit to support your argument.
Does it translate to them "blaming the airplane"? Seriously? Spare us from the fake outrage, and have some respect. Everyone knows what they are talking about.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.