Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I thought the GOP wasn’t a fan of eminent domain?
Where did you get that idea? It's not like their entire properties will be taken just enough to build the wall. I think it's pretty selfish to object to it since it's about our national security. I say those who refuse to yield a small portion of their land we build around them and then they can just deal with the illegal trespassers, criminals, terrorists, drug runners who will just funnel right through their property then. Bet they'll be begging for a wall in no time.
I thought the GOP wasn’t a fan of eminent domain?
Eminent domain is necessary evil for large infrastructure projects whether it's power lines, water, highways or a border wall. Projects like this could never get done without it. What I'm not a fan of is seizing property only to sell it to Wal-Mart or someone else.
Where did you get that idea? It's not like their entire properties will be taken just enough to build the wall. I think it's pretty selfish to object to it since it's about our national security. I say those who refuse to yield a small portion of their land we build around them and then they can just deal with the illegal trespassers, criminals, terrorists, drug runners who will just funnel right through their property then. Bet they'll be begging for a wall in no time.
They won't be able to stop it, if anything they may sue if they feel the offered is too small. Given the area a lot of the wall will be built I would assume most landowners are going to be quite happy to get that check.
The government has taken land before 'just because'. They've take property 'just because'. They've taken bank accounts 'just because'. This doesn't register too high on the scale of **** the government has taken.
Where did you get that idea? It's not like their entire properties will be taken just enough to build the wall. I think it's pretty selfish to object to it since it's about our national security. I say those who refuse to yield a small portion of their land we build around them and then they can just deal with the illegal trespassers, criminals, terrorists, drug runners who will just funnel right through their property then. Bet they'll be begging for a wall in no time.
About our national security—
Yet the GOP doesn’t care that Trump was throwing the Ukraine under the Russian troikas???
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
