Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
The explosions—which may have been missile or drone strikes but that has yet to be confirmed—suggest that whoever is behind them wanted to strike fear right in the heart of Russia.
Status:
"Let this year be over..."
(set 25 days ago)
Location: Where my bills arrive
19,224 posts, read 17,105,490 times
Reputation: 15540
If it was caused by the Ukrainian Army at least they have the decency to choose a military target unlike the Russians who only seem capable of terrorizing the civilian populace.
If it was caused by the Ukrainian Army at least they have the decency to choose a military target unlike the Russians who only seem capable of terrorizing the civilian populace.
If they did it, hope they didn't use Nato weapons.
Just speaking from a military angle there is no way Ukraine would be able to get their territory back if they had a "can't fire into Russia" anchor around their neck.
I still think we are in the early stages of WWIII. Attacking a Russian military base is a big provocation.
Oh hey, you know what else is a big provocation? Invading a neighboring country wholesale after having already annexed a fourth of it, indiscriminately shelling civilian targets, destroying civilian energy infrastructure to try freezing them to death, leaving behind mass graves filled with civilians, etc. And you want to call a MILITARY RESPONSE on a MILITARY TARGET of the aggressor a "provocation?"
The explosions—which may have been missile or drone strikes but that has yet to be confirmed—suggest that whoever is behind them wanted to strike fear right in the heart of Russia.
Is it possible that this could be the result of careless smoking?
Oh hey, you know what else is a big provocation? Invading a neighboring country wholesale, indiscriminately shelling civilian targets, destroying critical civilian infrastructure to try to freeze them to death, leaving behind mass graves filled with civilians, etc. And you want to call an attack on a MILITARY TARGET of the aggressor a "provocation?"
FOH with that noise.
I don't disagree with you. Russia is committing war crimes. But they have nuclear weapons.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
