Pregnancy and covid mRNA shots (independent, compared, claim, propaganda)
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
A research article was published in Nature looking at effects of covid mRNA shots during pregnancy. The only problem it found was an increased risk of caesarian delivery.
Of course, being published in Nature, the goal was to reassure pregnant "people" that they should follow the CDC advice to get ever more covid boosters.
Well, common sense should intervene and tell us that requiring a caesarian means something is not right. The authors did not know why the shots caused caesarians increase. Of course they made it seem like oh no big deal.
It was already known that the mRNA shots can get into female reproductive organs and cause menstrual problems. So what else can they do to those organs?
But the CDC still relentlessly pushes the boosters for pregnant women.
I have a relative who "trusts The Science" and runs out to get every recommended shot for herself and her family. Even though she is pregnant and her 3 year old child is healthy. Everybody gets more and more and more of the shots.
Now she is about 9 and a half months pregnant, and my guess is will need a caesarian. Of course she will never connect that with the shots. Just a coincidence, of course.
This mentally ill people at the CDC recommend that 6 month old babies get vaccinated with the mRNA COVID jab.
Yes I know. Even though there is ZERO chance a healthy baby will be harmed by covid. And being vaccinated does NOTHING to prevent catching covid and passing it to others. And the vaccines were never tested on babies or children.
I don't know if the CDC is mentally ill or just evil.
Our analysis represents high quality evidence showing that COVID-19 vaccination effectively raises antibody titers against SARS-CoV-2. This may confer protection against infection during pregnancy and the postpartum period. In addition to being protective against SARS-CoV-2, the vaccine was associated with decreased odds of preterm delivery. Furthermore, COVID-19 vaccination may also be associated with higher odds of cesarean section.
A total of 1,051 eligible postpartum women were included. Of these, 834 (79.4%) had received an mRNA vaccine, while 217 (20.6%) had not, mainly due to concerns about the effect of vaccination on the fetus. Vaccination did not increase the incidence of adverse perinatal outcomes, including fetal morphological abnormalities. The vaccinated group demonstrated low COVID-19 morbidity and severity. In the vaccinated group, the preterm birth rate, cesarean section rate, and COVID-19 incidence were 7.2%, 33.2%, and 3.3%, respectively, compared with the 13.7%, 42.2%, and 7.8% in the unvaccinated group, respectively. Almost no serious adverse reactions were associated with vaccination.
If you're not pregnant or about to become pregnant, then why worry about this? Each pregnancy is unique, needs to be medically evaluated for any risk factors, and a discussion with one's OB about taking any inoculation (or not) is important.
If you're not pregnant or about to become pregnant, then why worry about this? Each pregnancy is unique, needs to be medically evaluated for any risk factors, and a discussion with one's OB about taking any inoculation (or not) is important.
Most MDs will follow the CDC advice, without bothering to question or investigate further.
Most MDs will follow the CDC advice, without bothering to question or investigate further.
You don't know that unless you've talked to each MD. Again, if *you're* not pregnant or about to or plan to become pregnant, why are you worrying about something that 1. doesn't affect you and 2. isn't your business...because it's an individual choice that resides with the patient and their doctor.
Promising for what? Causing caesarian deliveries? And you highlighted decreased risk of preterm birth -- couldn't that just be because the vaccines can cause delayed birth and therefore require a caesarian?
The fact that this admission can get through the propaganda and censorship is noteworthy. Of course they never speculate about the reasons, and about whether the reproductive organs can be damaged by the vaccines.
Caesarian is of course sometimes necessary, but it IS NOT GOOD. Not good for the mother, or especially the baby, who is supposed to experience the natural contractions and trip down the canal.
And a lot of the pro-covid-vaccine research is deviously contrived.
What do you mean, exactly? Science relies a lot on independent testing and validation, so it's more difficult to get away with contrived results than in, say, well.. just about anything else. What you're claiming sounds more like typical politics.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
