Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-23-2008, 11:45 AM
 
Location: Missouri, USA
789 posts, read 1,335,224 times
Reputation: 146

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by BigJon3475 View Post
Is NASA?
What does NASA have to do with that article? That article doesn't mention NASA once.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-23-2008, 11:46 AM
 
29,939 posts, read 39,492,612 times
Reputation: 4799
Quote:
Originally Posted by fancofu View Post
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/shared/bsp/h...matereport.pdf
IPCC - Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (http://www.ipcc.ch/ipccreports/index.htm - broken link)
Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis
http://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-re...yr/ar4_syr.pdf
http://dpa.aapg.org/gac/statements/climatechange.pdf
AIP Endorsement of American Geophysical Union Climate Change Statement
The Geological Society of America - Proposed Position Statement on Global Climate Change


Your not even trying to find the information out. It took me about 20 seconds to get the links. I'll give you time to rebut them then I'll post some more.

If you are serious about finding the information out you will look for it. It's obvious that you just want to argue. You have yet to provide any evidence to support your claim that the organizations that I listed are now denying Global Warming.
2001,2004,2006,2007.....

But in the year we are in?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-23-2008, 11:47 AM
 
Location: Missouri, USA
789 posts, read 1,335,224 times
Reputation: 146
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigJon3475 View Post
How about the space and science research center?
It doesn't mention them either.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-23-2008, 11:49 AM
 
29,939 posts, read 39,492,612 times
Reputation: 4799
Quote:
Originally Posted by fancofu View Post
What does NASA have to do with that article? That article doesn't mention NASA once.
NASA: Solar cycle may cause “dangerous” global cooling in a few years time « Aftermath News

Today, the Space and Science Research Center, (SSRC) in Orlando, Florida announces that it has confirmed the recent web announcement of NASA solar physicists that there are substantial changes occurring in the sun’s surface. The SSRC has further researched these changes and has concluded they will bring about the next climate change to one of a long lasting cold era.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-23-2008, 11:50 AM
 
Location: Missouri, USA
789 posts, read 1,335,224 times
Reputation: 146
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigJon3475 View Post
2001,2004,2006,2007.....

But in the year we are in?
You wanted the links so I gave them.

At least I'm giving reference material to support my claims. You have yet to give any evidence to support your claims.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-23-2008, 11:50 AM
 
78,523 posts, read 60,718,007 times
Reputation: 49836
Quote:
Originally Posted by ELOrocks17 View Post
News - Environment: Surprise spring snowfalls blanket KZN (http://www.int.iol.co.za/index.php?set_id=1&click_id=14&art_id=vn2008092108 4615870C810928 - broken link)


Please explain...
Basically, there is variance and then there is the mean. I would try to further explain this but it is a waste of time as you have already reached a conclusion despite not having a firm grasp of these two concepts.

How this thread got to 5 pages is probably the only thing funnier than your *conclusion*.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-23-2008, 11:51 AM
 
29,939 posts, read 39,492,612 times
Reputation: 4799
Quote:
Originally Posted by fancofu View Post
It doesn't mention them either.
Your wearing rose colored glasses...your seeing only what you want to see.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-23-2008, 11:52 AM
 
13,053 posts, read 12,962,737 times
Reputation: 2618
Quote:
Originally Posted by fancofu View Post
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/shared/bsp/h...matereport.pdf
IPCC - Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (http://www.ipcc.ch/ipccreports/index.htm - broken link)
Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis
http://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-re...yr/ar4_syr.pdf
http://dpa.aapg.org/gac/statements/climatechange.pdf
AIP Endorsement of American Geophysical Union Climate Change Statement
The Geological Society of America - Proposed Position Statement on Global Climate Change


Your not even trying to find the information out. It took me about 20 seconds to get the links. I'll give you time to rebut them then I'll post some more.

If you are serious about finding the information out you will look for it. It's obvious that you just want to argue. You have yet to provide any evidence to support your claim that the organizations that I listed are now denying Global Warming.
Look, I asked you to provide a report. You gave me third party links with summaries. I asked you again for the actual report, you gave me more wiki garbage links and claimed it was there when you did not understand what I was asking because you yourself do not know what you are talking about.

Now I guess you were able to use google and find the IPCC site, but again you have failed to link me the actual report.

So I will link it for you.

http://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-re...yr/ar4_syr.pdf

Read it, read it all, pay attention to the uncertainties.

Also, I noticed you barely answered any of my questions. You seem to be googling everything and just cut and pasting it without any clue of what it means.

The fact that you wasted so much time being stubborn and not providing the actual report tells me one of two things.

1) You have no clue about what you are talking about and too stubborn to admit it.

2) You are devious in your discussion style and will be evasive in everything we discuss.

Either way, discussing this with you would be a complete waste of time. I have no wish to run in circles with you like you do with the links you provide. So, you go on ignore as a person who has nothing to provide to a discussion other than wasting peoples time pushing an ill informed view on a topic. Good day!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-23-2008, 11:54 AM
 
Location: Missouri, USA
789 posts, read 1,335,224 times
Reputation: 146
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigJon3475 View Post
NASA: Solar cycle may cause “dangerous” global cooling in a few years time « Aftermath News

Today, the Space and Science Research Center, (SSRC) in Orlando, Florida announces that it has confirmed the recent web announcement of NASA solar physicists that there are substantial changes occurring in the sun’s surface. The SSRC has further researched these changes and has concluded they will bring about the next climate change to one of a long lasting cold era.
Do you realize that the "solar hibernation" is independent of Global Warming happening on Earth? It may affect it, but it is independent of it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-23-2008, 12:02 PM
 
Location: Missouri, USA
789 posts, read 1,335,224 times
Reputation: 146
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nomander View Post
Look, I asked you to provide a report. You gave me third party links with summaries. I asked you again for the actual report, you gave me more wiki garbage links and claimed it was there when you did not understand what I was asking because you yourself do not know what you are talking about.

Now I guess you were able to use google and find the IPCC site, but again you have failed to link me the actual report.

So I will link it for you.

http://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-re...yr/ar4_syr.pdf

Read it, read it all, pay attention to the uncertainties.

Also, I noticed you barely answered any of my questions. You seem to be googling everything and just cut and pasting it without any clue of what it means.

The fact that you wasted so much time being stubborn and not providing the actual report tells me one of two things.

1) You have no clue about what you are talking about and too stubborn to admit it.

2) You are devious in your discussion style and will be evasive in everything we discuss.

Either way, discussing this with you would be a complete waste of time. I have no wish to run in circles with you like you do with the links you provide. So, you go on ignore as a person who has nothing to provide to a discussion other than wasting peoples time pushing an ill informed view on a topic. Good day!
You obviously aren't even reading my posts. You are linking a website that I have already given. One that you dismissed.

You claimed that the organizations I listed have changed their minds. Either give a source or retract your claim.

I've provided links to everything I have claimed. If you don't want to read the links that's fine.

I like how, instead of backing up your claims, you have resorted to ad hominem attacks. It's cool. I'll get over it.

The cool thing about the Global Warming wiki is that you can scroll down to read the references. All the links you have asked me to provide are at the bottom of the website.

You have a lot of reading to do. Peace.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top