Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-31-2008, 12:12 PM
 
1,763 posts, read 5,998,516 times
Reputation: 831

Advertisements

If they take away the deductibility of 401k plans, I imagine that most retirement contributions will be re-directed by individuals to their Roth IRAs, for obvious reasons.

The "new" plan the Dems are talking about would essentially be a forced savings plan for all Americans, that pays 3% and is also adjusted for inflation.

Now, I personally abhor being told what to do with my investments, but the success of this program really depends on what lies ahead, in macro-economic terms.

Let me explain:

Everything right now points to a recession, but there are increasing concerns that hyper-inflation may follow that recession. If that happens, God help us all. Nothing survives that event, unless you are a very astute investor, and know which investments will save your bacon. Most American's 401k accounts would be completely wiped out.

HOWEVER, if Americans are forced to save money, in accounts that are inflation-protected, that money may turn out to be the only pension they would have after such a macro-economic event, in addition to social security.

CBSMarketWatch, before they became just MarketWatch, had an article one time that stated only 8% of Americans save enough for retirement. The other 92% depend heavily upon social security. If that is the case, the additional forced savings the Dems are proposing would be a lifeline to that 92%, particularly after a hyper-inflationary event.

Personally, I believe I've taken the appropriate steps to protect my family from both a depression, and also from hyper-inflation. Most Americans have not, though, and would probably suffer greatly as a result.

Maybe the Dems/Congress know something we don't. Or maybe they're just being Dems...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-31-2008, 02:54 PM
 
Location: Orlando, FL
973 posts, read 2,229,806 times
Reputation: 383
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zhang Fei View Post
Why not? Is it the mandatory contribution that you oppose? Or the confiscation of assets?
Why not? It's just another 5% tax for a Social Security system. Government shouldn't take over private investment accounts. Simple as that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:49 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top