Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-10-2009, 09:04 AM
 
Location: Charleston, WV
3,106 posts, read 7,383,849 times
Reputation: 845

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by saganista View Post
Yes...peaked at 7.8% in June 1992...
You got me curious.... will leave it to others to analyze....

1920 5.2 ...........1928 4.2 .............1930 8.7 ............1932 23.6 ............1934 21.7 ............1936 16.9 ..........1938 19.0
1940 14.6 ..........1942 4.7
1950 5.3 ............1956 4.1 .............1958 6.8
1960 5.5
1970 4.9 ............1972 5.6 ............1976 7.7 ...........1978 6.1
1980 7.1 ............1982 9.7 ............1984 7.5 ...........1986 7.0 ...............1987 6.2 ..............1988 5.5 .............1989 5.3
1990 5.6 ............1991 6.8 ............1992 7.5 ...........1993 6.9 ...............1994 6.1 ..............1995 5.6 .............1996 5.4
1997 4.9 ............1998 4.5
2000 4.0 ............2001 4.7 ............2002 5.8 ............2003 6.0 ..............2004 5.5 ..............2005 5.1 ..............2006 4.6
2007 4.6

Data from http://www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0104719.html also good data at http://www.data360.org/dsg.aspx?Data_Set_Group_Id=44

Last edited by vec101; 01-10-2009 at 09:14 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-10-2009, 09:06 AM
 
Location: Jonquil City (aka Smyrna) Georgia- by Atlanta
16,259 posts, read 24,798,754 times
Reputation: 3587
Thank GOD Almighty that in 10 days the criminal Republicans will be gone. Then we can begin to fix the messes they left.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-10-2009, 09:08 AM
 
29,939 posts, read 39,513,802 times
Reputation: 4799
And I thought with Blago and Richardson were making their own little pretty mess.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-10-2009, 09:09 AM
 
Location: Jonquil City (aka Smyrna) Georgia- by Atlanta
16,259 posts, read 24,798,754 times
Reputation: 3587
Quote:
Originally Posted by Icy Tea View Post
9% by next year, maybe higher the year after that.
I do not think we are headed to 1933 again but I do think we might see 1982 again. 1933 was The Great Depression. 1982 was The Great Recession. I recall unemployment being about 10% back then. We could see it that high again.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-10-2009, 11:46 AM
 
Location: Midwest
38,496 posts, read 25,868,248 times
Reputation: 10791
Quote:
Originally Posted by bbkaren View Post
I try not to politicize this aspect of it. Things are bad worldwide.

But if it makes you feel good to have a couple extra moments of Bush bashing, have at it.
Here is what the Bush administration did to U.S. jobs.

Treasury Chief Defends Outsourcing of U.S. Work - New York Times
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-10-2009, 01:19 PM
 
Location: Dallas, TX
31,767 posts, read 28,862,289 times
Reputation: 12341
Quote:
Originally Posted by LIS123 View Post
If you think King Obama is going to fix this economy on the spot, keep dreaming. The main tool in his arsenal is a printing press and he's ready to use it. Our dollars will be a lot weaker when he runs for re-election than when he is inaugurated!
And we can thank Bush for his legacy that Obama inherits (and republicans will be quick to blame him for it).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-10-2009, 01:22 PM
 
Location: Dallas, TX
31,767 posts, read 28,862,289 times
Reputation: 12341
Quote:
Originally Posted by KevK View Post
I do not think we are headed to 1933 again but I do think we might see 1982 again. 1933 was The Great Depression. 1982 was The Great Recession. I recall unemployment being about 10% back then. We could see it that high again.
If we used the same standard that we used in 1930s to measure unemployment, the number right now would be about 16.5%. LBJ can be credited for coming up with the idea of showing lower unemployment numbers than the reality.

During the Great Depression, unemployment was at about 24%. FDR's New Deal is said to have brought it down to 15%. It went way down with the arrival of WWII.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-10-2009, 02:28 PM
 
Location: Jonquil City (aka Smyrna) Georgia- by Atlanta
16,259 posts, read 24,798,754 times
Reputation: 3587
Quote:
Originally Posted by EinsteinsGhost View Post
If we used the same standard that we used in 1930s to measure unemployment, the number right now would be about 16.5%. LBJ can be credited for coming up with the idea of showing lower unemployment numbers than the reality.

During the Great Depression, unemployment was at about 24%. FDR's New Deal is said to have brought it down to 15%. It went way down with the arrival of WWII.
Perhaps but usually the TRUE unamployment rate is found by taking the OFFICAL rate, dividing it in half and adding it to the official rate. So if unemployment is 7%, 7/2=3.5+7=10.50 so the real rate is probably 10.5%.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-10-2009, 02:33 PM
 
Location: Midwest
38,496 posts, read 25,868,248 times
Reputation: 10791
Quote:
Originally Posted by KevK View Post
Perhaps but usually the TRUE unamployment rate is found by taking the OFFICAL rate, dividing it in half and adding it to the official rate. So if unemployment is 7%, 7/2=3.5+7=10.50 so the real rate is probably 10.5%.
And add to that the unemployment that will be increased when the soldiers come back from Iraq.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-10-2009, 03:30 PM
 
Location: Charleston, WV
3,106 posts, read 7,383,849 times
Reputation: 845
I'm going to play Devil's Advocate here and throw out this link: American Thinker: Why the Mortgage Crisis Happened

Don't kill the messenger - just throwing this out for some food for thought. If nothing else, pick through the rhetoric and read the facts. Pretty interesting.

Names Obama as part of the reason for mortgage crisis stemming from his activities with Acorn back in the 1990's. Now wouldn't that be ironic if his actions back then were a part of the reason for the mortgage crisis which is part of the reason for the current economy? Ironic if he was part of the cause and now is looked to all as being a prime factor in fixing the existing problems?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:19 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top