Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Location: Jonquil City (aka Smyrna) Georgia- by Atlanta
16,259 posts, read 24,798,754 times
Reputation: 3587
Quote:
Originally Posted by Icy Tea
9% by next year, maybe higher the year after that.
I do not think we are headed to 1933 again but I do think we might see 1982 again. 1933 was The Great Depression. 1982 was The Great Recession. I recall unemployment being about 10% back then. We could see it that high again.
If you think King Obama is going to fix this economy on the spot, keep dreaming. The main tool in his arsenal is a printing press and he's ready to use it. Our dollars will be a lot weaker when he runs for re-election than when he is inaugurated!
And we can thank Bush for his legacy that Obama inherits (and republicans will be quick to blame him for it).
I do not think we are headed to 1933 again but I do think we might see 1982 again. 1933 was The Great Depression. 1982 was The Great Recession. I recall unemployment being about 10% back then. We could see it that high again.
If we used the same standard that we used in 1930s to measure unemployment, the number right now would be about 16.5%. LBJ can be credited for coming up with the idea of showing lower unemployment numbers than the reality.
During the Great Depression, unemployment was at about 24%. FDR's New Deal is said to have brought it down to 15%. It went way down with the arrival of WWII.
Location: Jonquil City (aka Smyrna) Georgia- by Atlanta
16,259 posts, read 24,798,754 times
Reputation: 3587
Quote:
Originally Posted by EinsteinsGhost
If we used the same standard that we used in 1930s to measure unemployment, the number right now would be about 16.5%. LBJ can be credited for coming up with the idea of showing lower unemployment numbers than the reality.
During the Great Depression, unemployment was at about 24%. FDR's New Deal is said to have brought it down to 15%. It went way down with the arrival of WWII.
Perhaps but usually the TRUE unamployment rate is found by taking the OFFICAL rate, dividing it in half and adding it to the official rate. So if unemployment is 7%, 7/2=3.5+7=10.50 so the real rate is probably 10.5%.
Perhaps but usually the TRUE unamployment rate is found by taking the OFFICAL rate, dividing it in half and adding it to the official rate. So if unemployment is 7%, 7/2=3.5+7=10.50 so the real rate is probably 10.5%.
And add to that the unemployment that will be increased when the soldiers come back from Iraq.
Don't kill the messenger - just throwing this out for some food for thought. If nothing else, pick through the rhetoric and read the facts. Pretty interesting.
Names Obama as part of the reason for mortgage crisis stemming from his activities with Acorn back in the 1990's. Now wouldn't that be ironic if his actions back then were a part of the reason for the mortgage crisis which is part of the reason for the current economy? Ironic if he was part of the cause and now is looked to all as being a prime factor in fixing the existing problems?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.