Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 03-29-2009, 03:33 PM
 
Location: Pinal County, Arizona
25,100 posts, read 39,261,360 times
Reputation: 4937

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Katiana View Post
However, I would submit it is a very small sub-set of Canadians.
Nor, have I, or anyone else, suggested otherwise.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-29-2009, 03:36 PM
 
Location: Pinal County, Arizona
25,100 posts, read 39,261,360 times
Reputation: 4937
Personally, I find it encouraging that the Health Insurance companies have agreed to start changing the way they treat pre-existing conditions.

Hopeful signs
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-29-2009, 03:56 PM
 
1,653 posts, read 1,170,588 times
Reputation: 442
Quote:
Originally Posted by Greatday View Post
Personally, I find it encouraging that the Health Insurance companies have agreed to start changing the way they treat pre-existing conditions.

Hopeful signs
I think it's to little to late the insurance companies should be dumped.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-29-2009, 03:56 PM
 
Location: on the edge of Sanity
14,268 posts, read 18,933,960 times
Reputation: 7982
In Florida our Governor has worked with insurance companies to design affordable plans to FL residents. Still, although applicants won't be denied coverage entirely, they will need to be on the plan for a year in many cases before getting benefits for any illness related to that condition. However, the policyholder will be covered for unrelated services.

Personally, I think if we are going to begin programs like this, we need to do so with a clean slate and have an open enrollment period the way Medicare is designed, i.e., the open enrollment for a supplement starts on the first day of the month in which you turn 65 and are also enrolled in Medicare Part B. After you enroll in Part B, the 6 month medicare supplement open enrollment period starts. During this open enrollment period, an insurance company can't deny insurance coverage or place conditions on a policy or rate up the premiums because of past health conditions. So if a health plan was designed to encourage people to enroll now or be penalized later, I believe it would attract a lot of interest.

Last edited by justNancy; 03-29-2009 at 04:06 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-29-2009, 04:01 PM
 
Location: Pinal County, Arizona
25,100 posts, read 39,261,360 times
Reputation: 4937
Quote:
Originally Posted by jimw144 View Post
I think it's to little to late the insurance companies should be dumped.
IMO, the insurance companies will not, nor cannot, be "dumped". There are reforms that can be made that may help lots of people to be able to access insurance.

One thing for sure - access has to be voluntary - not coerced (made mandatory).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-29-2009, 04:07 PM
 
Location: Foot of the Rockies
90,297 posts, read 120,759,995 times
Reputation: 35920
Quote:
Originally Posted by justNancy View Post
Regarding the question about $800 a month, that's pretty average. I'm a licensed health insurance agent. If you are talking about only catastrophic coverage, it's cheaper. Even with a $10,000 deductible, a family of 4 will cost about $750 a month for comprehensive coverage. Many people have cheaper plans and don't realize how little they cover until they get sick. That's one big problem with insurance. There are many plans out there that cover the basics, but a serious illness can bankrupt even a person with health insurance.

Group coverage is the best, but many employers don't offer benefits. The annual premium that a health insurer charges an employer for a health plan covering a family of four averaged $12,700 in 2008, according to the NCHC.

A recent study by Harvard University researchers found that the average out-of-pocket medical debt for those who filed for bankruptcy was $12,000. The study noted that 68% of those who filed for bankruptcy had health insurance.

NCHC | Facts About Healthcare - Health Insurance Costs (http://www.nchc.org/facts/cost.shtml - broken link)
Agreed. My daughter just turned 25, has to go off our policy. It will cost $500/mo for her to maintain her current benefits through COBRA. She is looking around for something cheaper, as she hopes to be working in a few months (is a full time student). As said, cheaper policies are often that . . . cheap. When you get sick, you find out they don't cover much.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-29-2009, 04:33 PM
 
Location: Forests of Maine
37,468 posts, read 61,396,384 times
Reputation: 30414
Quote:
Originally Posted by justNancy View Post
As far as I know, we are the only industrialized nation that doesn't have a national health plan. So are you saying Canada, France, India, Israel, Germany, Finland, England, Ireland, Scotland, Wales, Australia, New Zealand....

and the list goes on and on
...
I have lived in Scotland and in Italy.

I have been treated in hospitals in both of those nations, and I have seen many others treated there as well.

Lets not fool ourselves.

If you have family living near by who can bring you food each day, who can change your dressings, who can wipe the doctor's cigarette ashes off your dressings and sweep the floors each day; then laying in a Ospitale bed could be a good option.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-29-2009, 04:38 PM
 
Location: Pennsylvania, USA
5,224 posts, read 5,012,232 times
Reputation: 908
Quote:
Originally Posted by Greatday View Post
Personally, I find it encouraging that the Health Insurance companies have agreed to start changing the way they treat pre-existing conditions.

Hopeful signs

Did you know GD.. that while they wanted to "cover everyone" irregardless of pre-existing conditions.. they said that they ALSO wanted insurance to be mandatory in order for it to properly work.

It was in an article that I had posted a few weeks ago when they started getting together for health reform.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-29-2009, 05:22 PM
 
122 posts, read 210,039 times
Reputation: 40
Quote:
Let's call it what it is folks. It ain't health care. It's sick care. We need to change our way of thinking. In fact, I'm much less of a liberal as people think, since I believe if people want to join a National Health Plan, they have to agree to scheduled checkups and following a healthful lifestyle, including regular exercise & a sensible diet. If that offends anyone, because it puts more "government" in your life, then don't join a national health plan!
Im not sure if you have read through all of the discussion on here and other threads about this but many people are against UHI because of the increased taxes and costs associated with it. I am also afraid that it is a slippery slope to UHC which will cost even more money. Also who is going to watch people exercise and eat right? The government?

If in Denver and NEPA there is a long wait for specialists (as someone has mentioned) than it just simply means that they need more doctors. NEPA is rural PA and Denver's population has grown so much. My family has had very little wait times here for specialists. Watch how many doctors leave the profession if UHC occurs. Then you will see some wait times!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-29-2009, 05:25 PM
 
Location: Santa Monica
4,714 posts, read 8,461,458 times
Reputation: 1052
Quote:
Originally Posted by Perlagirl25 View Post
Watch how many doctors leave the profession if UHC occurs. Then you will see some wait times!

Ok, so you believe that most/many of today's doctors got into it for the money. Those days are already over.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:25 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top