Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-24-2009, 07:51 PM
 
Location: Imaginary Figment
11,449 posts, read 14,466,505 times
Reputation: 4777

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by tonyandclaire89 View Post
Given that the economy has been seriously threatened by the financial crisis, Obama has acted quickly to surround himself with people tasked to restore trust and confidence to our banking system. The ad hoc approach of the current Secretary of the Treasury will hopefully yield to a more reasoned effort, but it is clearly one in which the government will inject huge amounts of money into the system to give it, in Obama’s words, “a jolt.”
Moderator cut: copyrighted material. Please post a link and do not cut and paste entire articles.
I'm not sure if you have looked outside your window over the last few years, but Bush made sure it was decimated by the time he left office.

So the talk about "ruining the economy" is hilarious.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-24-2009, 08:04 PM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,481,831 times
Reputation: 27720
I think this all started when we dropped the gold standard and gave the Fed free reign to print money.
If you look at economic history from there on bits and pieces come together. Each administration had their little part that, as a piece, did not cause too much damage. It wasn't until they all bubbled out in 2007..the debt bubble couldn't take on any more and started leaking at the seams.

The laws and regulation changes over the years is what led to this, not the current or past administration but several more previous to that. This didn't happen over night you know; the megabank monopolies took years in the making as did all the shadow banking speculation.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-24-2009, 08:30 PM
 
Location: Brooklyn, New York
4,116 posts, read 3,146,899 times
Reputation: 1531
Quote:
Originally Posted by tonyandclaire89 View Post
Given that the economy has been seriously threatened by the financial crisis, Obama has acted quickly to surround himself with people tasked to restore trust and confidence to our banking system. The ad hoc approach of the current Secretary of the Treasury will hopefully yield to a more reasoned effort, but it is clearly one in which the government will inject huge amounts of money into the system to give it, in Obama’s words, “a jolt.”
Moderator cut: copyrighted material. Please post a link and do not cut and paste entire articles.

I think you meant to say how Obama and the Democrats WILL FIX THE MESS THE REPUBLICANS PUT US IN.......
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-24-2009, 09:08 PM
 
19,198 posts, read 31,476,088 times
Reputation: 4013
Quote:
Originally Posted by momonkey View Post
YouTube - Shocking Video Unearthed Democrats in their own words Covering up the Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac Scam that caused our Economic Crisis[/url]
Those videos are like advertising ignorance. They are sliced, diced, and edited propaganda pieces with appropriate inserts to tell you what to think. I just posted links to the transcripts of the hearings from which those videos were made. Maybe you should save yourself future embarassment by reading them sometime. Here are those links again...

Committee Hearings: September 10, 2003

Subcommittee Hearings: October 6, 2004


Quote:
Originally Posted by momonkey View Post
"The Federal Reserve may not permit a company to form a financial holding company if any of its insured depository institution subsidiaries are not well capitalized and well managed, or did not receive at least a satisfactory rating in their most recent CRA exam.

If any insured depository institution or insured depository institution affiliate of a financial holding company received less than a satisfactory rating in its most recent CRA exam, the appropriate Federal banking agency may not approve any additional new activities or acquisitions under the authorities granted under the Act."

CRA Amendments in the Gramm-Leach Act

Congress Passes Financial Services Modernization Act of 1999
CRA had nothing to do with the credit crisis, and Clinton's enforcement of it came to an abrupt halt on January 20, 2001. CRA loans made primarily between 1995 and 2000 actually performed better than industry averages. Nearly half of all CRA borrowers were qualified at prime terms, and almost all the rest at Alt-A, the level just below prime. The loans that failed and triggered this crisis were typically made at deliberately high cost terms by unregulated private brokers between 2002 and 2006 as they sought to feed the ravenous appetites of Wall Street investment banks earning huge profits and bonuses by pumping paper of any quality at all into the secondary markets. Strip off the profit, sell off the risk. And the Bushies just looked the other way.

You have once again fallen for transparent propaganda. This time it's from bonehead Thomas DiLorenzo of the so-called Mises Institute who came up with the CRA fiction as an attempt to cover up and shift blame off of Bush and onto Democrats. Guess you just haven't looked into any of this very deeply.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-24-2009, 09:11 PM
 
Location: New York, New York
4,906 posts, read 6,847,392 times
Reputation: 1033
Quote:
Originally Posted by tonyandclaire89 View Post
Given that the economy has been seriously threatened by the financial crisis, Obama has acted quickly to surround himself with people tasked to restore trust and confidence to our banking system. The ad hoc approach of the current Secretary of the Treasury will hopefully yield to a more reasoned effort, but it is clearly one in which the government will inject huge amounts of money into the system to give it, in Obama’s words, “a jolt.”
Moderator cut: copyrighted material. Please post a link and do not cut and paste entire articles.
The economy was destroyed before Obama even graduated college. Reagan put up the smoke in mirrors that everyone thought had fixed the previous problems with the economy, but all it has been was a series of bubbles. The bubbles have burst and it's about time we abandoned the myth of supplyside economics.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-24-2009, 09:34 PM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,481,831 times
Reputation: 27720
You can't spend your way to prosperity.
You can't tax your way to prosperity.

Obama is doing just that. I thought in his campaign speeches he would be tighening the belt, reigning in spending, righting the wrongs done to the economy by both parties.

So far I see none of that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:37 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top