Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Malkin: Who’s surprised that President Obama trashed police officers as “stupid” on national TV and implied they were racist despite “not having been there and not seeing all the facts, what role race played in that?”
President Obama said that one action of one person was stupid. How can a supposedly rational person say that's the same as "trash[ing] police officers as 'stupid'?" Sounds a bit unhinged to me.
Secondly, she uses President Obama's statement that he can't say there was any racial component because he wasn't there to accuse him of "impl(ying) they were racist." She's not a stupid woman, so we have to conclude that she's an intentionally deceptive, America-hating troll. Anybody who would distort and dissemble that way just to bash our President should be shunned by normal people.
But that's what you get from one of the leading mainstream conservative pundits: lies and hate.
President Obama said that one action of one person was stupid. How can a supposedly rational person say that's the same as "trash[ing] police officers as 'stupid'?" Sounds a bit unhinged to me.
Secondly, she uses President Obama's statement that he can't say there was any racial component because he wasn't there to accuse him of "impl(ying) they were racist." She's not a stupid woman, so we have to conclude that she's an intentionally deceptive, America-hating troll. Anybody who would distort and dissemble that way just to bash our President should be shunned by normal people.
But that's what you get from one of the leading mainstream conservative pundits: lies and hate.
If I'm not mistaken he said that the police acted stupidly.
How can a blanket and inclusive (police as in plural and collective) statement like that be construed as singling out a single individual?
Oh! Wait a minute! I know. When you're an idealogue whose head is firmly implanted in the silicon soil on one side of the fence you can interpret it anyway you want.
Obama should have steered clear of that question..not knowing all the facts..period Malkin's point is valid.
You would be making sense if her point was "Obama should have steered clear of that question." Unfortunately for you, she said something entirely different. In fact, she lied about the whole thing. How is her point valid?
You would be making sense if her point was "Obama should have steered clear of that question." Unfortunately for you, she said something entirely different. In fact, she lied about the whole thing. How is her point valid?
Read the statement..that is what I am commenting on..
__________________
- Please follow our TOS.
- Any Questions about City-Data? See the FAQ list.
- Want some detailed instructions on using the site? See The Guide for plain english explanation.
- Realtors are welcome here but do see our Realtor Advice to avoid infractions.
- Thank you and enjoy City-Data.
As for Obama lying, I'm planning to print out the transcript of his speech and see if I can find any truth in any of his statements.... Anyone else care to take that dare?
Location: I currently exist only in a state of mind. one too complex for geographic location.
4,196 posts, read 5,845,143 times
Reputation: 670
who's michelle malkin?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Malkin's point is valid.
