Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
What I never will get is how people attack people who want to take care of our planet. It's like someone attacking a kid for helping an old lady across the street. Makes no sense.
B.S. argument, nobody is attacking anybody for wanting to take care of the planet...........The premise that GW, climate change, whatever you want to call it today, is fact, and caused by humans, is what is being called into question...
As a scientist myself, I'm unconvinced by mere opinions as even our grants are dependent on skewing results to favor results to keep grant money flowing towards our research groups.
I've read some of these scientists' papers and while they contain some empirical evidence, they do not provide a convincing argument on the causal events.
Actually, I don't have a freakin' clue what you're talking about.
it takes quite a bit of thinking to decipher my sarcasm
of rightwing loudmouths on the dole queue, thinking they are Donald trump:
be that s it may:
Quote:
23 Jul 2009
A new paper says changes in ocean currents, rather than carbon dioxide,
explain most of the recent warming:
Overall the results suggest that the Southern Oscillation exercises a
consistently dominant influence on mean global temperature, with a maximum
effect in the tropics, except for periods when equatorial volcanism causes
ad hoc cooling.
That mean global tropospheric temperature has for the last 50 years fallen
and risen in close accord with the SOI of 5-7 months earlier shows the
potential of natural forcing mechanisms to account for most of the
temperature variation.
But then the natural question arises, what caused the ocean heat content to change in the first place?
Did the whales become more active? Did the aliens do it? Are there massive subsurface volcanic eruptions, or....
Maybe, remotely, possibly, yet, a bit of?
CO2
PS. andrew bolt is right wing butjob, much like limbaugh
I've read some of these scientists' papers and while they contain some empirical evidence, they do not provide a convincing argument on the causal events.
I can tell by your post that you are extremely well versed on the subject and by the links and data you provided, one can also determine that you are a whiz at research. Keep up the good work...the world needs more great minds such as yours.
We can tell by your post that you have joined the ranks of the arrogant. Keep up the good work.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
