Quote:
Originally Posted by macmeal
Racism includes ANY special treatment of a person for reasons of race. It's often confused with, (and often overlaps) the related issue of 'cultural clash', or the lack of the ability of people of differing cultures to 'read' each others' intentions.
|
Macmeal, i have to play devils advocate on this statement. I think your overall assessment was very well written and well thought out. However, the statement above begs me to ask you the question on how you would react to this question based on what you wrote above.
"Racism includes ANY special treatment of a person for reasons of race."
What i disagree on is this would you consider the following racist
1. Corp Subsidies - (special treatment of a person for reasons of occupation and or race?) - A person could play devils advocate and say that most farmers that benefit from a corp subsidy are of European decent therefore, this is a racist policy, because it benefits European farmers at the expense of other individuals right?
2. Tariffs on anything grown aboard - (special treatment of a person for reasons of occupation and or country or origin) - A person could play devils advocate and say that most Americans that benefit from Tariffs or Quotas
on foreign goods are nationalist and racist towards individuals in other countries, because through this special treatment policy they are denying those individuals a job based on country of origin or ethnic background???
3. Medicare/Social Security - (special treatment of a person for reason of age and or economic ability - A person could play devils advocate and say that most Americans that benefit from special set aids (like Affirmative Action) at the expense of other individuals are racist???
4. Milk Subsidies for Wisconsin farmers - (special treatment of person based on occupation/ethnicity/location - A person could play devils advocate and say that most Americans that benefit from special set aids for Milk Subsidies in Wisconsin are racist, because most if not all farmers in Wisconsin are Dutch decedents etc
I understand your focus was strictly related to "Affirmative Action" but isn't everything i listed above pretty much the exact same as "Affirmative Action" for women and minorities??? Isn't Affirmative Action just like a corp subsidy, milk subsidy for farmers in Wisconsin, tariffs subsidies for American workers, etc
I would rephrase the paragraph i quoted to say the following let me know if you agree.
Racism includes ANY special treatment of a person for reasons of
race, occupation, age, location, national background. It's often confused with, (and often overlaps) the related issue of 'cultural clash', or the lack of the ability of people of differing cultures to 'read' each others' intentions.
Doesn't that seem more accurate and balanced???
Let me know your thoughts on the four above i'm really curious to see how you respond