Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Would you? Could you?
Yes. A salary that high would be worth being a publicly known as a proven liar. 5 12.50%
Yes. The opportunity to advance my agenda by appealing to the miguided/uneducated would be worth being publicly known as a proven liar. 1 2.50%
Maybe. It would depend on the actual salary and what kind of distortions/lies my employer would expect from me. 2 5.00%
No. I could never continually lie to a misguided/uneducated audience on a daily basis for financial or political gain. 27 67.50%
I don’t know. 2 5.00%
Other. 3 7.50%
Voters: 40. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-11-2009, 09:51 PM
 
609 posts, read 2,122,973 times
Reputation: 248

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sagran View Post
A link to a site with the ad for Pamela Anderson's Extreme Video. That gives me confidence in it as a reliable source.
Then this left leaning publication also has no credence.
Tom Brokaw: Chris Matthews, Keith Olbermann Have "Gone Too Far"

Last edited by Reads2MUCH; 09-11-2009 at 11:05 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-11-2009, 09:53 PM
 
Location: Raleigh, NC/ West Palm Beach, FL
1,071 posts, read 2,267,099 times
Reputation: 861
Politico, it is difficult to reason with individuals that bring out or point out selective information. Or may I state, disregards information that it is not convenient to point out.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-11-2009, 09:55 PM
 
35,016 posts, read 39,260,185 times
Reputation: 6195
Quote:
Originally Posted by gregandvicky View Post
why don't you try a google search if you can figure it out, hundreds of them about all the aforementioned.

Gateway Pundit: Shocker... Keith Olbermann Lies About Tea Party Violence-- Compares Protesters to Hamas & Hezbollah (http://gatewaypundit.blogspot.com/2009/08/shocker-keith-olbermann-lies-about-tea.html - broken link)

Olbermann Watch - MSNBC's Countdown with Keith Olbermann: NEW RECORD: Olbermann Lies 20 Times in 8 Minutes on CNN

many many more, for Hannity, O'Reilly, Beck all of them.
First video "has been removed due to terms of use violation" and I cant make sense of the commentary. I found a transcript to what I think is it - this:

CNN.com - Transcripts

but I cant follow along that guy's commentary for it.

Second one - "Not merely spreading lies but convincing a dissatisfied portion of the population to believe their propaganda and to act out in anger" - it's true! The St Louis townhall, the other townhalls - everything he says is 100% true.

What else do you have?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-11-2009, 09:56 PM
 
Location: Reading, PA
4,011 posts, read 4,437,426 times
Reputation: 843
Quote:
Originally Posted by gregandvicky View Post
Then this left leaning publication also has no credence.
Tom Brokaw: Chris Matthews, Keith Olbermann Have "Gone Too Far"

You need to come out of mom's basement and get a life.
Huffington Post pimps porn? Really?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-11-2009, 09:57 PM
 
843 posts, read 1,301,905 times
Reputation: 274
Quote:
Originally Posted by Politico View Post
Unfortunately, I think that's the very issue. Most FOX viewers do not seem to have the critical thinking skills (dare I say, intellect) necessary to comprehend that they're being lied to by the hosts of their favorite FOX shows. Thus, the viral spread of misinformation (read: lies) by FOX "News" entertainers is misinterpreted by a large portion of feebleminded conservative viewers as factual information.

I wonder which response(s) Beck, Hannity and O'Reilly would choose in this particular poll...the first or the second?

I wonder how many FOX News viewers would choose the fourth response, while ironically (hypocritically?) taking no issue with their preferred FOX program host(s)?

You know, Lou Dobbs says about the same things as Beck. Dobbs left CNN and the ratings dropped. He went back to CNN and the ratings went back up. Guess this proves that CNN viewers are feebleminded liberals that believe CNNs lies are factual information. And don't forget Tucker Carlson at MSNBC. Another right wing liar. And Stossel at ABC. But all you want to talk about is people that happen to work for FOX??? You're intelligent.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-11-2009, 09:58 PM
 
Location: Over There
5,094 posts, read 5,454,044 times
Reputation: 1208
Quote:
Originally Posted by Politico View Post
Please cite where I "denigrated every person" who watches FOX.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Politico
Unfortunately, I think that's the very issue. Most FOX viewers do not seem to have the critical thinking skills (dare I say, intellect) necessary to comprehend that they're being lied to by the hosts of their favorite FOX shows. Thus, the viral spread of misinformation (read: lies) by FOX "News" entertainers is misinterpreted by a large portion of feebleminded conservative viewers as factual information.

I wonder which response(s) Beck, Hannity and O'Reilly would choose in this particular poll...the first or the second?

I wonder how many FOX News viewers would choose the fourth response, while ironically (hypocritically?) taking no issue with their preferred FOX program host(s)?
Really so this was your version of "love" for the viewers of Fox. Oh yes I see it now, such a sweet, lovely, kind post. *Please insert all the sarcasm you can muster into my comment*.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-11-2009, 09:59 PM
 
8,185 posts, read 12,670,236 times
Reputation: 2893
Quote:
Originally Posted by Politico View Post
If a news network or media organization offered you a salary in the $Millions (ala Glenn Beck, Sean Hannity, Bill O'Reilly, etc), would you have a problem distorting the truth and flat-out lying to your audience on a daily basis, in an effort to promote your employer's extremist political agenda?

Would the financial gain, the opportunity to be "famous" and/or your own extremist political ideologies be enough for you to abandon any sort of personal integrity or professional ethical standards?

Replace Beck, Hannity and O'Reillys names with Pelosi, Reid, Cheney and Helms etc... and you just might have a valid point.

The truth is that it is our dear public servants who have sold out for millions - they are the ones who knowingly and repeatedly lie to the people that they are sworn to serve. Yet you let them off the hook - or should I say that you let 'your guys' off the hook. Why is it that? Do you believe that your guys don't lie? Aren't corrupt? Or just that they lie less and aren't quite as rotten at those 'other guys'?

I read so much absolute crap on here about how stupid those repugs are and how stupid those democrats are and you know what? You get the government you deserve - and you people who are so happy, hell I'd even go so far as to say enthralled with the notion of belonging to a team that you will excuse and overlook all the many times you have been lied to and successfully manipulated into not questioning the status quo.

But hey, have fun throwing insults and sweeping generalizations about while Rome burns. If it entertains you and distracts you then you have done your party proud.

** this post is not just to Politico though it started out that way, but includes anyone who has ever typed 'the ________ are all stupid'.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-11-2009, 10:00 PM
 
35,016 posts, read 39,260,185 times
Reputation: 6195
Quote:
Originally Posted by Politico View Post
lol...Thanks, delusianne. I appreciate your honesty regarding your willingness to...um...lie for moolah.
I'll bet most people on here would, if they'd be honest with themselves. Three years is over mighty quickly but $120 million can last forever.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-11-2009, 10:02 PM
 
Location: Southcentral Kansas
44,882 posts, read 33,368,753 times
Reputation: 4269
Quote:
Originally Posted by Politico View Post
If a news network or media organization offered you a salary in the $Millions (ala Glenn Beck, Sean Hannity, Bill O'Reilly, etc), would you have a problem distorting the truth and flat-out lying to your audience on a daily basis, in an effort to promote your employer's extremist political agenda?

Would the financial gain, the opportunity to be "famous" and/or your own extremist political ideologies be enough for you to abandon any sort of personal integrity or professional ethical standards?
I don't think you watch Glenn Beck very often. I think he has stuck his neck out in exposing ACORN and continuing to pound on them. As of today, I haven't seen him tell one lie about them. I wonder why you say the things you said about integrity when you certainly probably do believe that Ubermann tells truth only. Right?

BTW, how many millions do you think Fox pays Beck? I sure don't know but have you noticed that it must be more since he has worn slacks and dress shoes the past two weeds and not jeans and tennies. He is getting better and better and I am sure he has to travel with body guards even to get from work to home. Nawwwww, ACORN wouldn't turn their Muscle for Money people loose on him, would they?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-11-2009, 10:05 PM
 
Location: Reading, PA
4,011 posts, read 4,437,426 times
Reputation: 843
Quote:
Originally Posted by dcadca View Post
Really so this was your version of "love" for the viewers of Fox. Oh yes I see it now, such a sweet, lovely, kind post. *Please insert all the sarcasm you can muster into my comment*.
With regard to Politico's posts, when the comments are qualified with the word "most", "all" no longer applies.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:55 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top