Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-19-2009, 08:58 AM
 
9,802 posts, read 11,196,252 times
Reputation: 8509

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by okccowboy View Post
Who would you rather have as a doctor? A doctor who is concerned primarily about your HEALTH or a doctor who is primarily concerned about his PROFIT margin? I'd prefer the former myself. If your doctor is in it for the money, I'd find another doctor. Profit and greed is not what healthcare should be about!
Why would you assume that a person who cares about money is greedy??? Do YOU care about money?? OF COURSE!! That does not mean that you are "greedy".

I want the rational doctor. A person that cares about their craft is a person that isn't demotivated. Think about it. If your company needs to save money, are you equally motivated if they cut your pay, make you work a lot harder, while acquiring more risk to get sued?? Will you be demotivated?? If you were rational you would be. There are plenty of people who seem to think others should be irrational.

Health care IS about helping people; it's about a career; it's about making money; its about paying your bills (education, overheads etc).

It's NOT about "helping" people who chose to smoke, drink, have cell phones, not study hard, etc. MOST people who don't have health care could have it if they made better decisions but that is for a different thread.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-19-2009, 09:18 AM
 
Location: Foot of the Rockies
90,297 posts, read 120,905,047 times
Reputation: 35920
I'd rather have the doctor who is willing to go the "extra mile" even if s/he isn't reimbursed for every lit bit of care given. Some will, some won't.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-19-2009, 09:18 AM
 
Location: Chicago, IL
8,998 posts, read 14,800,602 times
Reputation: 3550
Quote:
Originally Posted by MN-Born-n-Raised View Post
Why would you assume that a person who cares about money is greedy??? Do YOU care about money?? OF COURSE!! That does not mean that you are "greedy".

I want the rational doctor. A person that cares about their craft is a person that isn't demotivated. Think about it. If your company needs to save money, are you equally motivated if they cut your pay, make you work a lot harder, while acquiring more risk to get sued?? Will you be demotivated?? If you were rational you would be. There are plenty of people who seem to think others should be irrational.

Health care IS about helping people; it's about a career; it's about making money; its about paying your bills (education, overheads etc).

It's NOT about "helping" people who chose to smoke, drink, have cell phones, not study hard, etc. MOST people who don't have health care could have it if they made better decisions but that is for a different thread.

Riiight and the fact that a lot of insurance companies won't take you if you have a pre-existing condition or if you're dropped from your previous health insurance provider, it can take YEARS for a private company to take you on for a customer?

My cell phone bill is 90 a month. I don't think I could get a good health insurance policy for 90 a month. I have acne and people have been denied health insurance because of acne. I've been to a counselor before and people have been denied health insurance because they've seen counselors.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-19-2009, 09:32 AM
 
Location: Chicago, IL
8,998 posts, read 14,800,602 times
Reputation: 3550
Quote:
Originally Posted by okccowboy View Post
Who would you rather have as a doctor? A doctor who is concerned primarily about your HEALTH or a doctor who is primarily concerned about his PROFIT margin? I'd prefer the former myself. If your doctor is in it for the money, I'd find another doctor. Profit and greed is not what healthcare should be about!
Doctors’ Pay, a Key to Health Care Reform - Room for Debate Blog - NYTimes.com

Read the part about being forced into running a business.

Health Care Meltdown: How Healthcare Became Big Business and Bad Medicine is also a good read.

There's nothing wrong with a doctor wanting to make money, we all need money to survive. I just don't want my health being put on the line because my doctor's main goal is $$$$$$$$$$. The same thing goes for hospitals. Of course I know there are hospitals out there putting patients' health and safety at risk all for the alimighty dollar.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-19-2009, 02:47 PM
 
Location: Chicago, IL
8,998 posts, read 14,800,602 times
Reputation: 3550
Quote:
Originally Posted by MN-Born-n-Raised View Post

It's NOT about "helping" people who chose to smoke, drink, have cell phones, not study hard, etc. MOST people who don't have health care could have it if they made better decisions but that is for a different thread.

Think Progress » Health Insurers Consider A Caesarean-Section Pregnancy A Pre-Existing Condition

http://www.jacksonfreepress.com/inde...ssippi_091609/

Quote:
Mississippi Insurance Commissioner Mike Chaney expressed outrage today that the state of Mississippi is one of eight states in the nation, including the District of Columbia, which allows insurance companies to consider domestic abuse as a pre-existing condition with which to deny health-care coverage. The National Women's Law Center reported in April that the state of Arkansas passed a law prohibiting insurance companies to pull coverage for domestic violence survivors, putting a spotlight on the remaining states.

Blue Cross To Docs: Help Cancel Coverage - CBS News
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-20-2009, 06:00 AM
 
9,802 posts, read 11,196,252 times
Reputation: 8509
Quote:
Originally Posted by PurpleLove08 View Post

I just don't want my health being put on the line because my doctor's main goal is $$$$$$$$$$. The same thing goes for hospitals. Of course I know there are hospitals out there putting patients' health and safety at risk all for the alimighty dollar.

You don't want a doctor who's main goal is money. OF COURSE NOT. That is such an obvious statement. Who would???

Re: those hospitals putting patients as risk for the almighty dollar. Have you seen the crisis hospitals are in?? Many are going bankrupt. They are mandated by law to help people yet no one will reimburse them for their mandates. So the gun is against their heads; accept Obamba care or we will keep on forcing you to treat for free. Do you still believe hospitals really want this if they were not forced to treat people for free? People are loosing their jobs and the quality is going down for us payers. I say if you don't pay, you don't get! Let the chips fall where they may.

So the almighty dollar really has more to do with the "almighty" survival. I think you see things through purple glasses.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-29-2009, 07:49 PM
 
Location: Flippin AR
5,513 posts, read 5,247,360 times
Reputation: 6243
Default How the Military Gets Doctors

[quote=i3est21;10776412]Why not invest in training more doctors?

EXCELLENT IDEA! This is how the military got its doctors: it pays for intelligent young people to go to medical school, in return for a few years of service (we found out about this program too late). The gov't could create a network of doctors, trained using gov't funds, to provide service to those who have no insurance or are under-insured. This would actually SOLVE a real problem, unlike current proposals that do nothing to control costs, but make the insurance companies and BigPharma even richer, among other disasterous effects. And to those of you who think Doctors won't quit, despite making less money--they make enough in these lucrative years to position themselves so they CAN quit if the rewards aren't worth it. Or they'll at least cut their hours drastically (thus further limiting the supply of medical care), to make sure they don't trigger the thresholds of increased taxes. Doctors aren't dumb. They won't continue to work long office hours for less money. There are MANY alternative things Doctors can do besides practice end-user medicine.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-29-2009, 08:11 PM
 
Location: Hoboken
19,890 posts, read 18,774,915 times
Reputation: 3146
Quote:
Originally Posted by okccowboy View Post
Who would you rather have as a doctor? A doctor who is concerned primarily about your HEALTH or a doctor who is primarily concerned about his PROFIT margin? I'd prefer the former myself. If your doctor is in it for the money, I'd find another doctor. Profit and greed is not what healthcare should be about!

Hey I would rather have basketball players in it for the love of the game, I wish they didn't worry about profit. You say this is a trivial comparison, I agree, health care is way more important so these folks should be compensated way more. I want the person who has my life in their hands compensated as well as possible.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-29-2009, 08:13 PM
 
Location: Flippin AR
5,513 posts, read 5,247,360 times
Reputation: 6243
[quote=MisterNY;10777248] The article is a load of crock. Doctors are staying put. They would be happy making the same salaries, and having to deal with less BS from insurance companies, and lower malpractice suits.

The problem is that under both the Senate and the House bills, there is NO protection from lawsuits (concession to the Trial Lawyer Lobby), doctors have much MORE Insurance Co BS, and they won't be making the same salaries even if they adhere to the new gov't requirements that they (1) they limit how many of their patients get specialist care and high-cost services, and (2) join big medical conglomerates (that the feds can directly control).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-29-2009, 08:15 PM
 
Location: Imaginary Figment
11,449 posts, read 14,481,374 times
Reputation: 4777
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gary Siete View Post

Why would 45% of doctor's give up their livelihood? It is not a government takeover. It is a change to the health insurance industry that would add a public insurance option.
Yes it makes no sense. Clearly not going to happen.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:24 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top