Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-16-2009, 08:49 PM
 
Location: Michigan
29,391 posts, read 55,609,273 times
Reputation: 22044

Advertisements

New York City is considering banning smoking in public parks and beaches as part of a multi-pronged plan to make New Yorkers healthier, the health commissioner announced today.

“We don’t think children, parents when they’re standing at soccer games should have to be breathing in smoke from the person next to them,” Commissioner Thomas Farley said after unveiling the city’s plan. “We don’t think our children should have to be watching someone smoke.”

Mayor Bloomberg considers banning smoking in public parks and beaches
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-16-2009, 09:53 PM
 
Location: Earth
17,440 posts, read 28,610,850 times
Reputation: 7477
Why doesn't Bloomberg just move to California where he'd fit in better?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-16-2009, 09:59 PM
 
Location: Chicagoland area
554 posts, read 2,501,910 times
Reputation: 535
Indoor smoking I can understand, but outdoor smoking? I know smoking isn't the smartest thing to do, but smokers do have rights, as do the rest of us. It's not fair to limit someone's freedom just because you don't like what they do.

This seems to be more aesthetically pleasing than actually accomplishing anything..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-16-2009, 10:18 PM
 
26,680 posts, read 28,678,403 times
Reputation: 7943
Quote:
Originally Posted by CHICAGOLAND92 View Post
It's not fair to limit someone's freedom just because you don't like what they do.
Cool. This means you're okay with me doing naked cartwheels in public parks, right?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-16-2009, 10:20 PM
 
Location: in here, out there
3,062 posts, read 7,036,493 times
Reputation: 5109
Maybe if you jackass smokers didn't leave your stupid cigarette butts everywhere there wouldn't be such a backlash against them. Whenever I see someone smoking I wonder how many times they bother to throw out their butts.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-16-2009, 10:58 PM
 
Location: Brooklyn
141 posts, read 352,941 times
Reputation: 151
This is a great example of how some believe it's alright to use health and children as weapons of provocation in the wider culture war. The fact is that most of the people proposing or supporting this are simply being disingenuous cowards. It would be far more respectable thought if it were stated with complete honestly.

Thus, people who smoke should not have a right to smoke. Those who insist on this practice should be continually segregated until it is made illegal. Tobacco and all smoking products should be made illegal. We can not allow people who practice a socially detestable habit any level of equal consideration whatsoever. People who have children should be morally and legally considered as having greater natural rights over those who do not. People who do have children and smoke should be held liable for child endangerment. Smoking around children should be considered the equivalent of child abuse, involuntary imprisonment, reckless endangerment, attempted manslaughter. Children must be taught that there are some cultural situations and practices in which their parents should be considered as an enemy to their interests. Private adult citizens should not be forced into freely negotiating shared public space with one another where the state can do it more efficiently. Zero tolerance is a legitimate supremacist concept. Let's keep it that way.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-16-2009, 11:35 PM
LML
 
Location: Wisconsin
7,100 posts, read 9,113,256 times
Reputation: 5191
Unintended consequences can be funny things. My state, Wisconsin, have always had high taxes on tobacco products. But this year they just lost their mines and raised taxes so high that a carton of cigarettes are more than double their price a year ago. Guess what? Now they are complaining and having to make drastic cuts because they have lost so much sales tax revenue. Not only did their enormous tax hikes NOT bring them in additional revenue. They have lost millions of the sales tax revenues that they use to have because smokers are just getting their smokes from other states.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-17-2009, 01:15 AM
 
10,494 posts, read 27,250,314 times
Reputation: 6718
Quote:
Originally Posted by LML View Post
Unintended consequences can be funny things. My state, Wisconsin, have always had high taxes on tobacco products. But this year they just lost their mines and raised taxes so high that a carton of cigarettes are more than double their price a year ago. Guess what? Now they are complaining and having to make drastic cuts because they have lost so much sales tax revenue. Not only did their enormous tax hikes NOT bring them in additional revenue. They have lost millions of the sales tax revenues that they use to have because smokers are just getting their smokes from other states.
Yep, and that is why they are going to make it illegal to order cigarettes online. It's coming....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-17-2009, 06:20 AM
 
Location: Brooklyn, New York
877 posts, read 2,768,765 times
Reputation: 318
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tony Of New York View Post
This is a great example of how some believe it's alright to use health and children as weapons of provocation in the wider culture war. The fact is that most of the people proposing or supporting this are simply being disingenuous cowards. It would be far more respectable thought if it were stated with complete honestly.

Thus, people who smoke should not have a right to smoke. Those who insist on this practice should be continually segregated until it is made illegal. Tobacco and all smoking products should be made illegal. We can not allow people who practice a socially detestable habit any level of equal consideration whatsoever. People who have children should be morally and legally considered as having greater natural rights over those who do not. People who do have children and smoke should be held liable for child endangerment. Smoking around children should be considered the equivalent of child abuse, involuntary imprisonment, reckless endangerment, attempted manslaughter. Children must be taught that there are some cultural situations and practices in which their parents should be considered as an enemy to their interests. Private adult citizens should not be forced into freely negotiating shared public space with one another where the state can do it more efficiently. Zero tolerance is a legitimate supremacist concept. Let's keep it that way.
Yep, he might as well go ahead and push this through so that he can continue on his quest of making smoking illegal in New York City. Once he accomplishes that he can decide what the next thing is that he wants to get on his bandwagon about.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-17-2009, 06:23 AM
 
Location: Tennessee
37,803 posts, read 41,026,245 times
Reputation: 62204
Quote:
Originally Posted by John1960 View Post
New York City is considering banning smoking in public parks and beaches as part of a multi-pronged plan to make New Yorkers healthier, the health commissioner announced today.

“We don’t think children, parents when they’re standing at soccer games should have to be breathing in smoke from the person next to them,” Commissioner Thomas Farley said after unveiling the city’s plan. “We don’t think our children should have to be watching someone smoke.”

Mayor Bloomberg considers banning smoking in public parks and beaches
What's next? No drinking soda in public?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top