Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Doesn't bother me in the least. I'm not on the attack or on defense. It's a non-issue to me.
That does not surprise me at all. In fact, I can probably name everyone on these boards that it would of no be of a concern to either. The same people that condone health insurance company monopolies, gouging and Corporate Fascism. A very strange, obtuse and predictable lot.
You shouldn't be able to take out life insurance on someone without their permission - otherwise I could take out life insurance on you and benefit from your "accidental" death.
dead janitor policies the new corporate way to fund insurance and pension. how can you legally take out insurance on somebody w/o their knowledge?
especially if you provide the work environment for their safety and health
dead janitor policies the new corporate way to fund insurance and pension. how can you legally take out insurance on somebody w/o their knowledge?
especially if you provide the work environment for their safety and health
Does seem insane doesn't it? If I discoverd that someone did that without my knowledge, I'd hand them their head.
dead janitor policies the new corporate way to fund insurance and pension. how can you legally take out insurance on somebody w/o their knowledge?
especially if you provide the work environment for their safety and health
You shouldn't be able to take out life insurance on someone without their permission - otherwise I could take out life insurance on you and benefit from your "accidental" death.
No, because you don't have an insurable interest in a complete stranger. Employees are treated differently.
Funny how something like this would not concern everyone, but instead (predictably) of researching it, you go on the attack...pathetic! Whose the biased one???
Who is biased? Based on your original post, with no posting of the OUTCOME, you are - CLEARLY.
And, as others have pointed out, this is not that big of a deal. Mind you, OTHERS have stated it was no big deal - yet, you choose to attack me. Again, a sign of your bias.
That does not surprise me at all. In fact, I can probably name everyone on these boards that it would of no be of a concern to either. The same people that condone health insurance company monopolies, gouging and Corporate Fascism. A very strange, obtuse and predictable lot.
I think it's because it doesnt affect them personally, directly and immediately.
Same people who defended manufacturing jobs moving to Mexico in the 80s.
That does not surprise me at all. In fact, I can probably name everyone on these boards that it would of no be of a concern to either. The same people that condone health insurance company monopolies, gouging and Corporate Fascism. A very strange, obtuse and predictable lot.
Wow -- verbatim from the liberals talking point sheet.
No one has the right to benefit off of someone's demise in such a backhanded manner. No one!
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
