Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 12-09-2009, 07:32 PM
 
Location: here
24,873 posts, read 36,181,169 times
Reputation: 32726

Advertisements

bottom line - Sarah shouldn't be talking about things she knows nothing about (i.e. SCIENCE)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-09-2009, 07:34 PM
 
Location: Foot of the Rockies
90,297 posts, read 120,796,716 times
Reputation: 35920
Quote:
Originally Posted by sanrene View Post
The simplest definition/explanation is often the correct one....except for those looking for something else.

Google
In that case, we have to go with "male offspring", according to your google search.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-09-2009, 07:36 PM
 
Location: Chicagoland
41,325 posts, read 44,956,928 times
Reputation: 7118
Quote:
Originally Posted by rkb0305 View Post
bottom line - Sarah shouldn't be talking about things she knows nothing about (i.e. SCIENCE)
But, obama, gore and gibbs should be?

She has more creds than any of those, considering her experience as governor of an arctic state, her experience on the energy commissions.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-09-2009, 07:38 PM
 
Location: Chicagoland
41,325 posts, read 44,956,928 times
Reputation: 7118
Quote:
Originally Posted by Katiana View Post
In that case, we have to go with "male offspring", according to your google search.
More deflection, more laser-like focus on another "word" you don't care for? Too bad you don't apply that to any of the issues that appear on this forum everyday.

You don't like the word "man child"?

Too friggin bad and it is completely YOUR problem.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-09-2009, 07:42 PM
 
Location: Foot of the Rockies
90,297 posts, read 120,796,716 times
Reputation: 35920
Quote:
Originally Posted by sanrene View Post
More deflection, more laser-like focus on another "word" you don't care for? Too bad you don't apply that to any of the issues that appear on this forum everyday.

You don't like the word "man child"?

Too friggin bad and it is completely YOUR problem.
I think I hit a nerve!

"The simplest definition/explanation is often the correct one....except for those looking for something else."

Are you looking for something else?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-09-2009, 07:43 PM
 
Location: here
24,873 posts, read 36,181,169 times
Reputation: 32726
Quote:
Originally Posted by sanrene View Post
More deflection, more laser-like focus on another "word" you don't care for? Too bad you don't apply that to any of the issues that appear on this forum everyday.

You don't like the word "man child"?

Too friggin bad and it is completely YOUR problem.
no, it means your messiah is rude and condescending to the leader of our country. Why anyone pays any attention to anything she says, I will never understand. What has she done for you, anyway, that you put her up on a pedestal like you do? you clearly worship the woman. It's kind of creepy.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-09-2009, 07:45 PM
 
Location: San Diego
2,311 posts, read 2,829,800 times
Reputation: 893
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nomander View Post
McIntyre has already commented on one, specifically this one:

Recent unprecedented tree-ring growth in bristlecone pine at the highest elevations and possible causes  PNAS

His comments are here:

Salzer et al 2009 – A First Look « Climate Audit [Welcome to our new home!]



Also, NAS tends to be a part of the problem concerning data disclosure and the NAS Panel has been caught looking a bit... well... silly a few times in the process.

Reports « Climate Audit [Welcome to our new home!]
Thanks for the links. I'm going to go through some of the primary reports that are cited in his commentary. Lots of interesting commentary and discussion there.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-09-2009, 07:49 PM
 
Location: San Diego
2,311 posts, read 2,829,800 times
Reputation: 893
Quote:
Originally Posted by sanrene View Post
Sorry, there are hundreds, thousands, tens of thousands of scientists that have come forward to dispel the notion of the "settled" science.

Go through the threads on this forum, you will see the links.
Tell me these are not prominent, relevant scientists.

Petr Chylek: Open Letter to the Climate Research Community (http://www.thegwpf.org/opinion-pros-a-cons/218-petr-chylek-open-letter-to-the-climate-research-community.html - broken link)
Welcome to the Copenhagen Climate Challenge Web Site

Global Warming Petition Project

.: U.S. Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works :: Minority Page :.
Thats not how science works. You don't sign a petition and magically demonstrate causation or correlation.

Why don't you point out some literature from these prominent relevant scientists so I can examine their work not their signatures.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-09-2009, 09:03 PM
 
Location: Chicagoland
41,325 posts, read 44,956,928 times
Reputation: 7118
Quote:
Originally Posted by DrJoey View Post
Thats not how science works. You don't sign a petition and magically demonstrate causation or correlation.

Why don't you point out some literature from these prominent relevant scientists so I can examine their work not their signatures.
Plenty of papers and work out there. You could find it if you were really at all interested, which I know you are not, so don't waste people's time.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-09-2009, 09:09 PM
 
Location: Foot of the Rockies
90,297 posts, read 120,796,716 times
Reputation: 35920
Quote:
Originally Posted by sanrene View Post
You're not even remotely capable of hitting any of my nerves.

Its always a "word" that sticks in your craw, isn't it? Nevermind the actual issues, cause we know what happens then;



Now, back to the Palin and her pummeling of the man-child.
Always the violent metaphors.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top