Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Would those be the ones that Maliki heard from Obama and thought were just about right? Bush had spent years shunning all deadlines and timetables as things that only aided the enemy, but suddenly he couldn't wait to negotiate on when and how to get out...
Apparently, you think it's smart then, to tell the enemy when we're leaving? That certainly seems like flawed strategy. I wouldn't think you could win too many wars with that.
What school did you graduate from that teaches this kind of war planning? I doubt they teach this at West Point, Annapolis, or VMI.
Apparently, you think it's smart then, to tell the enemy when we're leaving? That certainly seems like flawed strategy. I wouldn't think you could win too many wars with that.
What school did you graduate from that teaches this kind of war planning? I doubt they teach this at West Point, Annapolis, or VMI.
I personally think it's smart not to START an unnecessary war in the first place.
Oh please. Bush always said the conditions on the ground would determine withdrawal.
Yes, and those conditions happened to be Obama sitting down to talk with Maliki.
Quote:
Originally Posted by sanrene
Obama had nothing to do with it, in fact it had been in the works for months.
All that had been in existence for months was the open-ended "conditions on the ground". That's where Bush was, that's where McCain was. Then, Poof!...16 months is the right timeframe for withdrawal with the possibility of some changes. Whole new ballgame...
Go back and read all the statements Bill Clinton ever made concerning Saddam, Iraq and WMD's.
Go back and read everything else that was written about Iraq, Saddam and WMD's before Bush/Cheney.
Besides, we know he had the weapons programs, and we know he had the weapons, because he had previously used them.
Hello?
I'm so tired of hearing liberals use this as the reason why we shouldn't have gone into Iraq, and using it as an excuse to call Bush a "liar".
Problem is that liberals begin to beleive their own lies, do they not?
What was being pushed by Bush as that he was creating new weapons programs, the whole Uranium debacle and what not. Of course we know he had the weapons at one point, Reagan gave it to him.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
