Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-18-2010, 09:43 AM
 
9,763 posts, read 10,548,641 times
Reputation: 2052

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by whatyousay View Post
The only jobs created by and large were government jobs... hence the rapid expansion of government under this administration.
The word "only" and the phrase "by and large" contradict each other. That said, though there is a case to be made concerning private vs. public sector, it's far better to have a job than not, regardless of which sector is employed.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-18-2010, 09:44 AM
 
938 posts, read 1,232,631 times
Reputation: 185
I bet Elvis would give me more than $13 bucks as a stimulus check.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-18-2010, 09:46 AM
 
9,763 posts, read 10,548,641 times
Reputation: 2052
Quote:
Originally Posted by 4Horsemen View Post
I bet Elvis would give me more than $13 bucks as a stimulus check.
I bet Elvis would understand that you do get more than $13.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-18-2010, 09:47 AM
 
938 posts, read 1,232,631 times
Reputation: 185
Quote:
Originally Posted by nvxplorer View Post
it's far better to have a job than not, regardless of which sector is employed.

Herein lies the FAIL.

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-18-2010, 09:50 AM
 
Location: Raleigh, NC
20,054 posts, read 18,327,287 times
Reputation: 3827
Quote:
Originally Posted by 4Horsemen View Post
Herein lies the FAIL.
If that form of Keynesian brain disease was even remotely true, all you have to do is hire people to dig holes and fill them back up.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-18-2010, 10:23 AM
 
9,763 posts, read 10,548,641 times
Reputation: 2052
Quote:
Originally Posted by summers73 View Post
If that form of Keynesian brain disease was even remotely true, all you have to do is hire people to dig holes and fill them back up.
Digging holes? LOL. I'm talking about private vs. public sector, not digging holes vs. harvesting wheat.

If you lost your job, would you turn down an offer because it's in the public sector?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-18-2010, 10:28 AM
 
Location: Land of debt and Corruption
7,545 posts, read 8,346,589 times
Reputation: 2889
Quote:
Originally Posted by nvxplorer View Post
Digging holes? LOL. I'm talking about private vs. public sector, not digging holes vs. harvesting wheat.

If you lost your job, would you turn down an offer because it's in the public sector?
Of course not. No sane person would. The point is, should the government supply jobs to every unemployed person in this country for the simple fact that they will no longer be unemployed? That's what you are proposing??
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-18-2010, 10:33 AM
 
Location: SE Arizona - FINALLY! :D
20,460 posts, read 26,395,445 times
Reputation: 7627
Quote:
Originally Posted by whatyousay View Post
Of course not. No sane person would. The point is, should the government supply jobs to every unemployed person in this country for the simple fact that they will no longer be unemployed? That's what you are proposing??
In the long run - no.
In the short run - whatever it takes.

Ken
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-18-2010, 10:36 AM
 
9,763 posts, read 10,548,641 times
Reputation: 2052
Quote:
Originally Posted by whatyousay View Post
Of course not. No sane person would. The point is, should the government supply jobs to every unemployed person in this country for the simple fact that they will no longer be unemployed? That's what you are proposing??
LOL! All I said was a job is better than no job, public or private sector. And it appears you agree with me.

If...I'll say it again...IF the private sector is not creating jobs, then the government can play a role in stimulating the economy. That's what I'm saying, which is a far cry from the government supplying jobs "to every unemployed person in this country."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-18-2010, 10:37 AM
 
Location: Land of debt and Corruption
7,545 posts, read 8,346,589 times
Reputation: 2889
Quote:
Originally Posted by LordBalfor View Post
In the long run - no.
In the short run - whatever it takes.

Ken
So in your (liberal) view, it's the government's responsibility to employ all unemployed. Got it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:48 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top