Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-03-2010, 08:46 PM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,495,743 times
Reputation: 27720

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by PurpleLove08 View Post
I've had enough of private companies dictating health care.
We need to take the profit out of the system and then we'll see costs decrease.
It's the insurance, not the doctors doing it.
Bypass the insurance and your costs will go down.
Find a doctor that takes cash. Then you just need insurance for hospital and catastrophic care.

That is the free market. There should always be profit else why would anyone work hard to have their own business. It's the insurance companies that came in and took over normal doctor visits and prescription medicine.

Dentists are reasonably priced although insurance has wrangled its way in there too. And cosmetic surgery..no insurance there and the prices are not sky high.

When there is no insurance and you have to pay out of pocket..the prices will go down as cash only doctors can cut out the middleman and save themselves a salary or two since they don't need extra people just filling out and following up on insurance claims.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-03-2010, 08:49 PM
 
Location: Chicago, IL
8,998 posts, read 14,789,526 times
Reputation: 3550
Quote:
Originally Posted by HappyTexan View Post
It's the insurance, not the doctors doing it.
Bypass the insurance and your costs will go down.
Find a doctor that takes cash. Then you just need insurance for hospital and catastrophic care.

That is the free market. There should always be profit else why would anyone work hard to have their own business. It's the insurance companies that came in and took over normal doctor visits and prescription medicine.

Dentists are reasonably priced although insurance has wrangled its way in there too. And cosmetic surgery..no insurance there and the prices are not sky high.

When there is no insurance and you have to pay out of pocket..the prices will go down as cash only doctors can cut out the middleman and save themselves a salary or two since they don't need extra people just filling out and following up on insurance claims.
I'd hate to see the cost of chemo under the "free market system." I still think it would be prohibitively expensive for people.

I don't disagree that insurance inflates prices. They are middlemen.

I disagree there should ALWAYS be a profit.

I say we go towards single-payer like so many other countries have done.
It's much easier and if docs don't want to be part of the system, so be it. They can see people who want private health insurance or who want to pay cash for all their services.

Everyone wins, eh?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-03-2010, 08:49 PM
 
Location: Columbus
4,877 posts, read 4,508,466 times
Reputation: 1450
Quote:
Originally Posted by PurpleLove08 View Post
Their reasons for opposing it were stupid and appealed to people who will take them at their word and not research the facts.
It wasn't a "socialist health care system" (I'm a socialist and PLENTY of socialists hate the bill) and it isn't a "government takeover of health care."
I've had enough of private companies dictating health care.
We need to take the profit out of the system and then we'll see costs decrease.

I don't why anyone would think it was a govt takeover of healthcare.

Could it be Obama said he wanted a government takeover of healthcare and then offers up a bill of thousands of pages and hundreds of new taxes? And the dems try their best not to let anyone know what is in it before they vote on it?

El Salvador also has a non-profit single payer system.

I don't know anything about it. You should research and see which is cheaper.

I don't need to research it. I know which one is cheaper. The private one.

I lived in socialist Cuba for some time. You should really move there and see how long you support socialist medicine. Or any type of big government.


After Cuba was when I decided I was a Voluntaryist.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-03-2010, 08:51 PM
 
Location: Columbus
4,877 posts, read 4,508,466 times
Reputation: 1450
Quote:
Originally Posted by PurpleLove08 View Post

I don't disagree that insurance inflates prices. They are middlemen.
The government is the middleman under socialized medicine.

So they will inflate prices also.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-03-2010, 08:53 PM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,495,743 times
Reputation: 27720
Quote:
Originally Posted by PurpleLove08 View Post
I'd hate to see the cost of chemo under the "free market system." I still think it would be prohibitively expensive for people.

I don't disagree that insurance inflates prices. They are middlemen.

I disagree there should ALWAYS be a profit.

I say we go towards single-payer like so many other countries have done.
It's much easier and if docs don't want to be part of the system, so be it. They can see people who want private health insurance or who want to pay cash for all their services.

Everyone wins, eh?
That cost would be covered..note I said insurance for hospital and catastrophic care (illness). What you don't need insurance for are the normal doctor visits, etc.
That is how the health system used to work years ago. You only used insurance when you went into the hospital (and that would include cancer).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-03-2010, 08:54 PM
 
Location: Chicago, IL
8,998 posts, read 14,789,526 times
Reputation: 3550
Quote:
Originally Posted by OhioIstheBest View Post
I don't why anyone would think it was a govt takeover of healthcare.

Could it be Obama said he wanted a government takeover of healthcare and then offers up a bill of thousands of pages and hundreds of new taxes? And the dems try their best not to let anyone know what is in it before they vote on it?

El Salvador also has a non-profit single payer system.

I don't know anything about it. You should research and see which is cheaper.

I don't need to research it. I know which one is cheaper. The private one.

I lived in socialist Cuba for some time. You should really move there and see how long you support socialist medicine. Or any type of big government.


After Cuba was when I decided I was a Voluntaryist.
Socialism isn't big government but nice try.

Socialists want the PEOPLE to control things that affect everyone such as health care, energy, education, etc.
We don't want corporations in control and we don't want the government controlling everything either.

http://dsausa.org/pdf/widemsoc.pdf


I'm not aware of Obama saying he wanted a government takeover of health care. Any chance you can find me a video clip of him saying this or an audio clip?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-03-2010, 08:58 PM
 
Location: The Republic of Texas
78,863 posts, read 46,634,918 times
Reputation: 18521
Quote:
Originally Posted by PurpleLove08 View Post


I'm not aware of Obama saying he wanted a government takeover of health care. Any chance you can find me a video clip of him saying this or an audio clip?


This is the exact thinking that got us into this mess.


I got a clue for you...

Actions speak louder than any words.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-03-2010, 09:02 PM
 
Location: Chicago, IL
8,998 posts, read 14,789,526 times
Reputation: 3550
Quote:
Originally Posted by HappyTexan View Post
That cost would be covered..note I said insurance for hospital and catastrophic care (illness). What you don't need insurance for are the normal doctor visits, etc.
That is how the health system used to work years ago. You only used insurance when you went into the hospital (and that would include cancer).
I doubt insurance is going up because of visits to primary care docs.
It's going up because humans get sick (it's inevitable) and the costs of treatment is expensive. Chemo isn't cheap, being in the hospital isn't cheap, etc.

The goals of health insurance companies to make money by denying claims or denying payment to claims are diametrically opposed to the needs of people who buy health insurance with the expectation their medical bills will be paid for.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-03-2010, 09:03 PM
 
Location: Conejo Valley, CA
12,460 posts, read 20,090,021 times
Reputation: 4365
Quote:
Originally Posted by PurpleLove08 View Post
Ahhh...sure you didn't claim it would have higher costs but you're trying to make people believe that government run insurance won't save money.
Sure, why would it save money? Why would a government run insurance have lower operating costs?


Quote:
Originally Posted by PurpleLove08 View Post
Have you even looked at the literature on single-payer outside of right-wing websites?
Have you looked at it outside biased liberal sources? A single-payer system is in no sense a clear win, there are a number of problems that arise in such a system.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-03-2010, 09:03 PM
 
Location: Chicago, IL
8,998 posts, read 14,789,526 times
Reputation: 3550
Quote:
Originally Posted by BentBow View Post
This is the exact thinking that got us into this mess.


I got a clue for you...

Actions speak louder than any words.

Don't blame me, I didn't vote for Obama.
I wasn't old enough to vote for Clinton or Bush....

Clinton signed NAFTA so he forever has earned my hatred for that.
Bush got us into two useless wars, gave us NCLB, gave us Medicare Part D...the list goes on.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:38 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top