Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Hey jwtwit?
They pretty much have everything sewed up but one thing they will never be able to do?
They can't stop us from saying the truth about what they have made legal.
It is legal to murder your child.
In this country that is suppose to be 80% Christian, they have made it legal by calling their child a different name.
The baby is not a baby but a fetus.
From now on instead of calling it abortion or "choice", lets just call it what it really is.
Murder.
Now in the fine print and changing of words?
How many murders are we working our b u t t s off to pay for?
Check out the states too.
But you know what?
What goes around will eventually come around.
from your first statement.
Those who attempt to oppose a woman's right to control her body are violating our laws,
Purely false it is not illegal to oppose abortion,
Well your buddy Scott Roeder sure proves you wrong.
Quote:
Originally Posted by wjtwet
the constitution does not have row versus wade in any amendment as your first statement claims.
Not consistent at all
No the constitution doesn't mention Roe or Wade. That's was a court case referred to the Supreme Court. The Constitution can't possible include the court cases which form the courts interpretation of the constitution. My statement claims the court in it's Roe v Wade decision found an constitutionally guaranteed right to an abortion.
You're confusing yourself. Take guidance from Ted Williams on that.
Hey jwtwit?
They pretty much have everything sewed up but one thing they will never be able to do?
They can't stop us from saying the truth about what they have made legal.
It is legal to murder your child.
In this country that is suppose to be 80% Christian, they have made it legal by calling their child a different name.
The baby is not a baby but a fetus.
From now on instead of calling it abortion or "choice", lets just call it what it really is.
Murder.
Now in the fine print and changing of words?
How many murders are we working our b u t t s off to pay for?
Check out the states too.
But you know what?
What goes around will eventually come around.
Call it what you want. It will still be up to the woman, not you.
Uh huh, and I suppose this christian taliban forbides women from leaving home without male relatives, forces them to cover up completely, blows up statues of bhudda, forbade educations, etc...
Give it up libs, your comparisons are PATHETIC.
These things are in the Christian bible:
Quote:
Additional evidence that a fetus is considered to be less than a human life is that the biblical penalty for causing a miscarriage is only a fine to be paid to the woman's husband (I don't know what is to be done if she doesn't have a husband!), while for an injury to a born person, it is life for life, eye for eye, etc. (Exodus 21:22-25, Leviticus 24:17-21). Even an infant under the age of one month is considered to be worth a lot less than an adult (Leviticus 27:1-8, Numbers 3:15,28,34,39,40,43). Also, the god once punished David by killing his newborn son (II Samuel 12:14-19); so apparently the right-to-life of the infant was not important.
The sanctity of life, born or “unborn”, is denied in many places. Two examples: “Now go and smite Amalek, and utterly destroy all that they have, and spare them not; but slay both man and woman, infant and suckling....” (I Samuel 15:3), “they shall fall by the sword: their infants shall be dashed in pieces, and their women with child shall be ripped up.” (Hosea 13:16)
A lot of the discussion on abortion has to do with “illegitimate” pregnancies. An adulterous woman is to be killed (Lev.20:10); with no mention of an exception if she is pregnant. And “A bastard shall not enter into the congregation of the Lord; even unto the tenth generation..” (Deut. 23:2). So according to the Bible neither the fetus nor the born child is worthy of much consideration.
From now on instead of calling it abortion or "choice", lets just call it what it really is.
Murder.
Now in the fine print and changing of words? How many murders are we working our b u t t s off to pay for?
Check out the states too.
But you know what?
What goes around will eventually come around.
Your entire righteous rant is invalidated by the bolded line. This is the crux of the issue for you as well then. So, once we have removed abortion completely off the taxpayer books (coming real soon!) you won't have anything more to say about it. I can't wait. This world would be a pretty awful place of the only objection to murder, rape, drug abuse, child abuse, etc. is the cost to the taxpayer of incarcerating the convicted felons after their taxpayer funded trials. BTW, I'm curious, as an actual dollar amount, how much of your yearly gross do you think actually paid for abortions obtained that year. A guess will do.
H
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
