Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-12-2010, 07:31 PM
 
Location: Chicagoland
41,325 posts, read 44,950,814 times
Reputation: 7118

Advertisements

Now, we all remember what candidate obama said on the campaign trail, don't we? That under Bush, family income went down $2000 - where he got that analysis, no one knows. According to the BEA, per capita income rose during Bush's two terms.

Remember when obama said this:

Quote:
"All in all, many middle-class families will see their incomes go up by about $3,000 because of the Recovery Act."
So far, he is a bit off in his projections. Once again, it is clear the Failed Stimulus did not have the impact that obama intended, not even close.

Income falls 3.2% during Obama's term - Washington Times

Quote:
"Under President Obama, only federal spending is going up; jobs, business startups, and incomes are all down. It is proof that the government can't spend its way to prosperity."
Quote:
While disposal income during Mr. Obama's term has risen $2.5 billion, extra cash for Americans rose $113 billion over Mr. Bush's first 15 months in office.
$1+ Trillion, circling the drain.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-12-2010, 07:37 PM
 
26,680 posts, read 28,674,422 times
Reputation: 7943
Quote:
Originally Posted by sanrene View Post
According to the BEA, per capita income rose during Bush's two terms.
Per capita income is meaningless to individuals. Real wages fell during the Bush years, just as they've been falling since the 1970s.

From 2006: http://www.nytimes.com/2006/08/28/business/28wages.html
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-12-2010, 07:53 PM
 
Location: Georgia, on the Florida line, right above Tallahassee
10,471 posts, read 15,835,178 times
Reputation: 6438
Quote:
Originally Posted by sanrene View Post
Now, we all remember what candidate obama said on the campaign trail, don't we? That under Bush, family income went down $2000 - where he got that analysis, no one knows. According to the BEA, per capita income rose during Bush's two terms.

Remember when obama said this:



So far, he is a bit off in his projections. Once again, it is clear the Failed Stimulus did not have the impact that obama intended, not even close.

Income falls 3.2% during Obama's term - Washington Times





$1+ Trillion, circling the drain.
THe stimulus faield because it made the stock market rise to 11,000.

Billions of dollars in retirement funds restored.

Billions. But you're right, if yuo don't get a check from the government for 3k, it's pretty much Obama's fault. I can agree to that. I hear some people on this board want him to give them a job and a free house, too.
Seems you want him to give people 3K.

Question.

DO you want Obama to give people a free 3k?
DO you not want Obama to give people a free 3k?

Tell me, in which case would Obama be right?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-12-2010, 07:58 PM
 
Location: Chicagoland
41,325 posts, read 44,950,814 times
Reputation: 7118
He should be held accountable for the drop in personal income, just like he and the Left held the previous administration accountable and capitalized politically on the situation.

Bad for thee, but not for he.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-12-2010, 08:03 PM
 
Location: Southeast
175 posts, read 600,579 times
Reputation: 154
So what.....what will you blame Obama for next?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-12-2010, 08:04 PM
 
Location: Chicagoland
41,325 posts, read 44,950,814 times
Reputation: 7118
Do you have anything worthwhile to say about the topic?

If not, maybe you should refrain from posting.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-12-2010, 08:04 PM
 
Location: Aloha, Oregon
1,089 posts, read 655,501 times
Reputation: 208
Quote:
Originally Posted by sanrene View Post
WOW! The Moonie Times, such unbiased reporting </sarcasm>
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-12-2010, 08:08 PM
 
Location: Chicagoland
41,325 posts, read 44,950,814 times
Reputation: 7118
From the BEA website.

What, do you think they make up the numbers?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-12-2010, 08:09 PM
 
26,680 posts, read 28,674,422 times
Reputation: 7943
We've just been through the worst recession since the Great Depression, so I doubt any sane person would be surprised to learn that personal income has decreased.

The recession began while Bush was still in office, so if you're going to blame Obama for the decrease in personal income, you have to blame Bush for starting the recession.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-12-2010, 08:20 PM
 
Location: Chicagoland
41,325 posts, read 44,950,814 times
Reputation: 7118
Quote:
Originally Posted by AnUnidentifiedMale View Post
We've just been through the worst recession since the Great Depression, so I doubt any sane person would be surprised to learn that personal income has decreased.

The recession began while Bush was still in office, so if you're going to blame Obama for the decrease in personal income, you have to blame Bush for starting the recession.
This was nowhere near as severe as the GD. If not for the financial collapse, it would have been a recession pretty much like any other.

You do realize we have one about every 8-10 years, don't you?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:02 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top