Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 05-20-2010, 01:10 PM
 
7,530 posts, read 11,369,496 times
Reputation: 3656

Advertisements

Has the government ever laid out who private businesses can reject to serve?

Last edited by Motion; 05-20-2010 at 01:25 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-20-2010, 01:28 PM
 
Location: Vermont
11,761 posts, read 14,656,809 times
Reputation: 18534
There are various statutes that set forth prohibited discrimination categories. They're not all the same (for instance, there are differences in the laws on housing, public accommodations, and employment) and there are also differences between state law and federal law.

There are also some quirky exceptions (for instance, the "Mrs. Murphy exception" for housing discrimination, which allows discrimination but is not an exception to the prohibition on discriminatory advertising).

What it comes down to, though, is that every form of discrimination is permitted, except that which is prohibited.

Want to keep Democrats out of your restaurant? Go ahead.

Want to prohibit people from parking Japanese cars in your parking lot? No problem.
Want to prohibit Japanese people from working in your factory? No way.

Want to say you won't hire white people? Not allowed.
Want to say you won't hire tattooed people? That's your choice.

Don't want to hire atheists to work in your office? That's prohibited.
Don't want to hire atheists to work as counselors in your church-run religious counseling service? That's okay.

Want to charge people under sixty years old a higher rent? Prohibited.
Want to charge people under sixty years old a higher price for a movie ticket? Legal (in Vermont) because age is not a protected category for public accommodations.

It's not unusual for lawyers to get people calling to complain about how they've been treated and hearing "Isn't that discrimination?" I've heard it myself many times. The question, though, isn't whether it is discrimination, but whether it is prohibited discrimination.

Civil rights law is a pretty broad and complicated area of the law, and I wouldn't hold myself out as an expert in much of it. Still, the general rule remains the same: the only discrimination that is prohibited is discrimination that some law has prohibited. It's a tautology, but it's also true.

I hope this helps.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-20-2010, 01:35 PM
 
7,530 posts, read 11,369,496 times
Reputation: 3656
Interesting.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:29 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top