Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 09-14-2011, 02:33 PM
2K5Gx2km
 
n/a posts

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by HistorianDude View Post

Oh look.....



President Eisenhower was born in Texas. In 1962 when he got his SSN, he was retired from the Presidency and living in Pennsylvania.

And yet... he got a California SSN.

Did you get that off Ancestry.com's website?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-14-2011, 02:34 PM
2K5Gx2km
 
n/a posts
Do we know if Obama's mother was in Conn. at any time?

Or is the clerical error what caused the discrepency?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-14-2011, 03:12 PM
 
26,579 posts, read 14,449,955 times
Reputation: 7435
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shiloh1 View Post
Do we know if Obama's mother was in Conn. at any time?

Or is the clerical error what caused the discrepency?
as far as i know stanley ann dunham was never in CT.

we have no way of knowing what caused the discrepancy and most likely neither does the president ( or the SSA for that matter ). the most likely explanation, IMO, is a simple mistype in the original data entry. hitting a 0 instead of a 9.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-14-2011, 03:19 PM
2K5Gx2km
 
n/a posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by wrecking ball View Post
as far as i know stanley ann dunham was never in CT.

we have no way of knowing what caused the discrepancy and most likely neither does the president ( or the SSA for that matter ). the most likely explanation, IMO, is a simple mistype in the original data entry. hitting a 0 instead of a 9.
That seems most reasonable and likely if she was never there. Just doing alot of family research will tell you people make mistakes, intentional and otherwise, all the time - and mostly because of personal issues. Seen it many times in trying to track down the true story and relationships - no need for controversy.

Also, note that the '9' and '0' are right next to each other on the key pad.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-14-2011, 04:29 PM
 
Location: Mississippi
3,047 posts, read 2,826,620 times
Reputation: 699
Guess this means Obama is not qualified to pick lettuce.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-14-2011, 04:31 PM
 
Location: Va. Beach
6,391 posts, read 5,168,625 times
Reputation: 2283
I was born in miami, my ssn# is from North Carolina.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-14-2011, 04:36 PM
 
Location: Mississippi
3,047 posts, read 2,826,620 times
Reputation: 699
Quote:
Originally Posted by HistorianDude View Post
Maybe in France. Not in the US.


The US Supreme Court has called bull sh*t on that claim.

US v. Wong Kim Ark
Wong Kim Ark v United States

"The question presented by the record is whether a child born in the United States, of parents of Chinese descent, who, at the time of his birth, are subjects of the Emperor of China, but have a permanent domicil and residence in the United States"

"The evident intention, and the necessary effect, of the submission of this case to the decision of the court upon the facts agreed by the parties were to present for determination the single question stated at the beginning of this opinion, namely, whether a child born in the United States, of parent of Chinese descent, who, at the time of his birth, are subjects of the Emperor of China, but have a permanent domicil and residence in the United States"

Obama's father never obtained permanent domicil and residence in the United States. Obama is not a citizen based on the WKA decision if he was born in Hawaii.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-14-2011, 04:40 PM
 
Location: Charlotte
679 posts, read 614,952 times
Reputation: 237
Quote:
Originally Posted by DraggingCanoe View Post
Wong Kim Ark v United States

"The question presented by the record is whether a child born in the United States, of parents of Chinese descent, who, at the time of his birth, are subjects of the Emperor of China, but have a permanent domicil and residence in the United States"

"The evident intention, and the necessary effect, of the submission of this case to the decision of the court upon the facts agreed by the parties were to present for determination the single question stated at the beginning of this opinion, namely, whether a child born in the United States, of parent of Chinese descent, who, at the time of his birth, are subjects of the Emperor of China, but have a permanent domicil and residence in the United States"

Obama's father never obtained permanent domicil and residence in the United States. Obama is not a citizen based on the WKA decision if he was born in Hawaii.
stop beatin that horse, its over and done with, Supreme Court said, born on US Soil then you are a Natural Born Citizen, fun thing called jus soli

Thanks for playing, come again
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-14-2011, 04:40 PM
 
Location: Mississippi
3,047 posts, read 2,826,620 times
Reputation: 699
Quote:
Originally Posted by HistorianDude View Post
Maybe in France. Not in the US.


The US Supreme Court has called bull sh*t on that claim.

US v. Wong Kim Ark
Justice Gray:

"The Amendment, in clear words and in manifest intent, includes the children born, within the territory of the United States, of all other persons, of whatever race or color, domiciled within the United States. Every citizen or subject of another country, while domiciled here, is within the allegiance and the protection, and consequently subject to the jurisdiction, of the United States."

again..Obama's father was never domiciled.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-14-2011, 04:47 PM
 
Location: Mississippi
3,047 posts, read 2,826,620 times
Reputation: 699
Quote:
Originally Posted by eborg View Post
stop beatin that horse, its over and done with, Supreme Court said, born on US Soil then you are a Natural Born Citizen, fun thing called jus soli

Thanks for playing, come again
It is clear many Obama supporters cannot read and understand the WKA decision.

Obama's father was never domiciled in the United States. Obama gains citizenship from the 14th Amendment..not the original Constitution because he is a mulatto.

Obama fails to meet the subject to jurisdiction in the 14th Amendment and WKA.

It is understandable Obama's social security is fraudulent, because he is not a 14th Amendment citizen.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:42 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top