Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-21-2010, 08:41 AM
 
45,777 posts, read 27,429,997 times
Reputation: 24033

Advertisements

OP/ED by C. Krauthammer

The Fruits of Weakness

The real news is that already notorious photo: the president of Brazil, our largest ally in Latin America, and the prime minister of Turkey, for more than half a century the Muslim anchor of NATO, raising hands together with Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, the most virulently anti-American leader in the world.

That picture -- a defiant, triumphant take-that-Uncle-Sam -- is a crushing verdict on the Obama foreign policy. It demonstrates how rising powers, traditional American allies, having watched this administration in action, have decided that there's no cost in lining up with America's enemies and no profit in lining up with a U.S. president given to apologies and appeasement.

They've watched President Obama's humiliating attempts to appease Iran, as every rejected overture is met with abjectly renewed U.S. negotiating offers. American acquiescence reached such a point that the president was late, hesitant and flaccid in expressing even rhetorical support for democracy demonstrators who were being brutally suppressed and whose call for regime change offered the potential for the most significant U.S. strategic advance in the region in 30 years.

...

This is not just an America in decline. This is an America in retreat -- accepting, ratifying and declaring its decline, and inviting rising powers to fill the vacuum.

Nor is this retreat by inadvertence. This is retreat by design and, indeed, on principle. It's the perfect fulfillment of Obama's adopted Third World narrative of American misdeeds, disrespect and domination from which he has come to redeem us and the world. Hence his foundational declaration at the U.N. General Assembly last September that "No one nation can or should try to dominate another nation" (guess who's been the dominant nation for the last two decades?) and his dismissal of any "world order that elevates one nation or group of people over another." (NATO? The West?)


What else can be said? He has put our country on more dangerous footing that we have ever had in my lifetime.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-21-2010, 08:45 AM
 
Location: Land of debt and Corruption
7,545 posts, read 8,346,589 times
Reputation: 2889
Charles Krauthammer is one of the most intelligent pundits out there and is spot on in his assessment of the Obama foreign policy disaster.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-21-2010, 08:49 AM
 
Location: Southcentral Kansas
44,882 posts, read 33,354,170 times
Reputation: 4269
Quote:
Originally Posted by whatyousay View Post
Charles Krauthammer is one of the most intelligent pundits out there and is spot on in his assessment of the Obama foreign policy disaster.
Whatyousaid.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-21-2010, 09:01 AM
 
Location: Portland, Oregon
7,085 posts, read 12,081,341 times
Reputation: 4125
Yes, what we need is US domination of everything.

That way, every time there is a conflict we can spend our money and send our soldiers in there to die.

Any nearly as powerful country who doesn't listen, we can nuke them back to the stone age...screw diplomacy.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-21-2010, 09:26 AM
 
45,777 posts, read 27,429,997 times
Reputation: 24033
Quote:
Originally Posted by subsound View Post
Yes, what we need is US domination of everything.

That way, every time there is a conflict we can spend our money and send our soldiers in there to die.

Any nearly as powerful country who doesn't listen, we can nuke them back to the stone age...screw diplomacy.
Do you understand that government's primary role is to protect its citizens?

If that means we have enough strength to make other countries count the cost and weigh the risk before making an attack, then the government has done its job.

Right now, there is low cost and low risk to support our enemies and make an attack. Are you OK that enemies find it easier to try and set off bombs in our country? I'm not.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-21-2010, 09:30 AM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,691,160 times
Reputation: 27720
The job of our military is defense, not offense.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-21-2010, 09:41 AM
 
45,777 posts, read 27,429,997 times
Reputation: 24033
It's job is to do what is necessary to ensure our protection - defense or offense.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-21-2010, 09:45 AM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,691,160 times
Reputation: 27720
Quote:
Originally Posted by DRob4JC View Post
It's job is to do what is necessary to ensure our protection - defense or offense.
So to make up a story about WMD's justifies an invasion of a country ?
And then when none are to be found change your story to "we have to save the people" ?

Proactive defense. No, not OK. Who gets to decide the potential enemy ?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-21-2010, 09:55 AM
 
Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea
68,372 posts, read 54,603,269 times
Reputation: 40841
Nice work

A duplicate thread attempting to substitute opinion for fact.

Get over it. nations have continually aligned themselves with scumbags if they derive benefit from it.

IF you really want to whine about asinine foreign policy, Bush negotiating with the known sponsor of the mass murder of Americans, Moammar Kadafi, would be a great place to start.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-21-2010, 10:00 AM
 
Location: Land of debt and Corruption
7,545 posts, read 8,346,589 times
Reputation: 2889
Quote:
Originally Posted by subsound View Post
Yes, what we need is US domination of everything.

That way, every time there is a conflict we can spend our money and send our soldiers in there to die.

Any nearly as powerful country who doesn't listen, we can nuke them back to the stone age...screw diplomacy.
Wow, way to sensationalize and overstate reality. LOL, has the US EVER 'nuked' any country back into the stone age?

So according to liberal philosophy, we should strive to the lowest common denominator? Got it.

Isn't it the libs who continually love to point out when another country takes the lead in ______ (fill in the blank).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:31 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top