Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
That was pretty weak as far as Obama hate propaganda goes. They need a ridiculous youtube video with some old white haired lady crying about wanting her country back. Now that's 2010 Obama hate propaganda.
Wow, let's get out the astonishment glasses and stop the presses. It should be called "Person who didn't like some one in the first place, and disagrees with anything that is labeled as their party stance, finds an opinion blog that has the same views they have and wrote an article they agree with".
The really sad part is how much isn't objectively referenced, because it's already a PRATT argument (point refuted a thousand times) even here as a tertiary source. Every time some one does; a new thread, a new "letter", or a new opinion piece is sent out that says the exact same thing. People can believe what they will, but if the only arguments involve hype and ad hominem attacks on anyone who might have a differing opinion...the point is already viewed as a pile of crap. People who view the world the same irregardless of objective reality (and are very vocal about it) are labeled cranks for very good reason.
That was pretty weak as far as Obama hate propaganda goes. They need a ridiculous youtube video with some old white haired lady crying about wanting her country back. Now that's 2010 Obama hate propaganda.
Kinda hard to kill the messenger when it's succinct, straight forward, to the point and mincing no words about Obama's incompetence, isn't it?
Kinda hard to kill the messenger when it's succinct, straight forward, to the point and mincing no words about Obama's incompetence, isn't it?
It's just the usual Fox cliches strung together, and from someone who touts his association with Fox/Hannity brand on his "About me" page (right above the "Media Inquiries" link) >shrug<
I dont know, I wouldnt go to his church. Oh, he doesn't have one.
Wow, let's get out the astonishment glasses and stop the presses. It should be called "Person who didn't like some one in the first place, and disagrees with anything that is labeled as their party stance, finds an opinion blog that has the same views they have and wrote an article they agree with".
The really sad part is how much isn't objectively referenced, because it's already a PRATT argument (point refuted a thousand times) even here as a tertiary source. Every time some one does; a new thread, a new "letter", or a new opinion piece is sent out that says the exact same thing. People can believe what they will, but if the only arguments involve hype and ad hominem attacks on anyone who might have a differing opinion...the point is already viewed as a pile of crap. People who view the world the same irregardless of objective reality (and are very vocal about it) are labeled cranks for very good reason.
There is a universe of distance between refuted and disproved. You don't feel so cute now, do you!!
this is jamy, i was born in CHINA 23 yeas ago. i am doing my business myself ,hope to befriends with my friends here . i am do international trade business. who have the same interest with me? haha, let us talk more to know better.
Haha...The spam on this thread is more entertaining then the content of the good revs blog.
If the government says it, I pretty much automatically believe the opposite. The government is not to be relied on for its veracity.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.