Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Sue, they may loose this week, they wont be in the superbowl, sorry..
I agree. It's such a long season, we've all seen teams succumb to late season injury so even the Seahawks, as brutal as they are looking today shouldn't be thinking Superbowl.
I'm just hoping they win the division and finish something like 11-5.
Then they at least have a shot as the 1-game format of the playoffs allows for all kinds of possibility....but yeah, I remember the Patriots 16-0 fail season and never get my hopes too high.
After Tillman snatched the sideline reporter from in front of the moving equipment on Sunday.....I turned to the other people watching the game and said,
"I guess Joe Namath isn't the only thing they have to watch out for on the sidelines."
Yeah, a desperate team on their own turf... I suspect they'll give the Bears a hell of a game. Provided their offense can get anything going.
Bears 34-13
Steelers are a worse team than the Vikings and won't be as lucky to generate 14 points off lucky bounces (Cutler fumble) and a once-a-year TD kick return....not to mention the 3-richochet interception lol.
Once the Bears D starts forcing some TO's and turning them into points either directly or via field position, I think the game could turn into a rout unless they catch some big breaks like the vikes did but I seriously doubt that.
Steelers are a worse team than the Vikings and won't be as lucky to generate 14 points off lucky bounces (Cutler fumble) and a once-a-year TD kick return....not to mention the 3-richochet interception lol.
Once the Bears D starts forcing some TO's and turning them into points either directly or via field position, I think the game could turn into a rout unless they catch some big breaks like the vikes did but I seriously doubt that.
how come when the Bears get turnovers they are playing opportunistic "Bears Football" but if someone else playing them does it they are getting lucky breaks?
how come when the Bears get turnovers they are playing opportunistic "Bears Football" but if someone else playing them does it they are getting lucky breaks?
Because Bear turnovers are expeted...their thebest at it...as the viking ship starts to take on water....
Steelers are a worse team than the Vikings and won't be as lucky to generate 14 points off lucky bounces (Cutler fumble) and a once-a-year TD kick return....not to mention the 3-richochet interception lol.
Once the Bears D starts forcing some TO's and turning them into points either directly or via field position, I think the game could turn into a rout unless they catch some big breaks like the vikes did but I seriously doubt that.
well said...wait until the d jells...
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Bengals look good last night, I'm surprised the Bears beat them! 
