Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Psychology
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 05-24-2014, 10:59 PM
 
Location: Northern Virginia
1,474 posts, read 2,316,901 times
Reputation: 3292

Advertisements

To respond to the main question:

No, women should not date kissless virgins for the sake of society. Women should date only men who they choose to date.

This troubled 22-year-old had Asperger's syndrome. If any woman would have dated him, the relationship most likely couldn't have become satisfying anyway, unless I suppose if he'd found an Aspy woman, not sure if even that could be harmonious though.

Asperger's is a frustrating mental roadblock in which the person desires human intimacy but is socially incapable of achieving human closeness in healthy ways.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-24-2014, 10:59 PM
 
1,024 posts, read 1,045,463 times
Reputation: 1730
Quote:
Originally Posted by zentropa View Post
You sound very angry at women.
Not really. They are what they are. Scorpion stings tortoise, etc. No, I'm "very angry" at the vermin who remade society into the iniquitous, abominable jungle that it's become.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-24-2014, 11:01 PM
 
1,024 posts, read 1,045,463 times
Reputation: 1730
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zelpha View Post
To respond to the main question:

No, women should not date kissless virgins for the sake of society. Women should date only men who they choose to date.
Of course not. The viability of civilization takes a backseat to the freedom of women to drag the future of the human species into the gutter. To those with the eyes to see, ancient attitudes and mores become more understandable and imperative by the day.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-24-2014, 11:03 PM
 
10,553 posts, read 9,685,680 times
Reputation: 4784
Quote:
Originally Posted by J.P. View Post
Sorry to break this to you, but 1)Magazines are created to make money and 2)Forums like this one are not representative of the general population. Unless a woman is hideous looking, there's going to be at least a few guys interested. The guys you're not interested in still count as options. Any average looking woman can go to a bar and get laid if she wanted. Whenever I hear a woman say guys won't look at her, it means the guys SHE IS INTERESTED IN won't look at her. There's a difference.
Women don't go to bars to get laid. Most of them are interested in meeting a guy who would not be looking at a woman as a piece of meat. That probably is a male/female difference.

I don't agree. There are lots of non-hideous women who may have poor social skills, or are shy, or have low-self-esteem---who have trouble finding a guy. And if you count having some guy who is looking for a one-night-stand as having a guy be interested in you, I don't think that's what most women are looking for. In fact most women find that approach repulsive.

Magazines are created to make money, you are right, and women's magazines wouldn't be full of advice on how to attract a man, how to tell if a man is attracted to you, how to tell if a man is in love with you, how to tell if a man will commit to you...on and on and on... ---if there weren't so many women interested in those topics, and those topics sold magazines. This shows that there are tons of women out there who feel like they can't find a guy.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-24-2014, 11:03 PM
 
1,024 posts, read 1,045,463 times
Reputation: 1730
Quote:
Originally Posted by ellemint View Post
Alpha, schmalpha. I can tell where you're coming from. Again, that's a pick-up artist myth, that women are most attracted to these super-confident, strutting, mysterious, magician lol types ---- women like different types of men, because women are individuals, with individual inclinations. The PUAs put forth this fake ideology of alpha male strategies to get girls, I don't think it works.
I could buy that statement, but unfortunately I have this thing called "life experience" that's taught me otherwise. I've seen exactly what they're attracted to, too many times.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-24-2014, 11:04 PM
 
377 posts, read 622,082 times
Reputation: 475
Quote:
Originally Posted by ellemint View Post
Alpha, schmalpha. I can tell where you're coming from. Again, that's a pick-up artist myth, that women are most attracted to these super-confident, strutting, mysterious, magician lol types ---- women like different types of men, because women are individuals, with individual inclinations. The PUAs put forth this fake ideology of alpha male strategies to get girls, I don't think it works.
If that were true, then the proverbial kissless virgin would become so rare that people would only believe it is the stuff of fiction and Hollywood films. Almost all men would have a certain amount of women that find them attractive if the above is to be believed. This is obviously not the case and there is an unspoken consensus on what the majority of women find attractive and unattractive in men. This is consistent with the fact there is a significant fraction of men who end up living their lives as kissless virgins.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-24-2014, 11:04 PM
 
22,278 posts, read 21,857,946 times
Reputation: 54737
Quote:
Originally Posted by tairos View Post
Not really. They are what they are. Scorpion stings tortoise, etc. No, I'm "very angry" at the vermin who remade society into the iniquitous, abominable jungle that it's become.
Who?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-24-2014, 11:07 PM
 
1,024 posts, read 1,045,463 times
Reputation: 1730
Quote:
Originally Posted by zentropa View Post
Who?
What difference does it make? The point is that anger at women would be pointless.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-24-2014, 11:07 PM
 
3,603 posts, read 5,959,358 times
Reputation: 3366
Quote:
Originally Posted by Astute View Post
Yet, most of these women actually turned out have lots of men after them and actually had sex with many of the men they desired. They want the elite men that good looking women get with relative ease, and the rest of the male population simply does not exist to them. If an average looking man looks at them, that doesn't count. Many of these alleged women on this forum have admitted to this after being further pressed on this matter.
Where did you receive all this "knowledge" from?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-24-2014, 11:08 PM
 
10,553 posts, read 9,685,680 times
Reputation: 4784
Quote:
Originally Posted by tairos View Post
I could buy that statement, but unfortunately I have this thing called "life experience" that's taught me otherwise. I've seen exactly what they're attracted to, too many times.
All people are more attracted to good-looking people. So good-looking men or women, people who have won the looks lottery, do have an advantage. But that doesn't automatically mean they are successful in dating or relationships. There are many exceedingly shy good-looking guys and girls, who don't do well in the social arena. Heck, this shooter-guy was good-looking; but he was as creepy as hell, and it seemed like he didn't even approach girls. He had more deep-seated problems than finding a girlfriend.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Psychology
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:54 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top