Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Religion and Spirituality
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 11-15-2010, 10:25 AM
 
Location: Toronto, ON
2,332 posts, read 2,841,010 times
Reputation: 259

Advertisements

To a Christian this subject is unphilosophical. We obviously bear the vigilance of someone dying, and the philosophy can even afford a state of temporal recognition for what the death is to the one dies. The infinity of approaching the in time is not your own and still it remarks that way of demanding a continuing Consciousness for the after-life. Nevertheless, there exists the difference of the social people's existence continuing and representing your death from the outside. The temporality accomplishes the finity (funny this word is not spelling recommended on the computer) of the Other's existence for you temporalizing in an Objective rather than subjective way.

Then there is the vigilance of failing Love responsibly: has it's objective time for events and commitments for the reconciliation of friends and foes; subjectively the struggle is to one's habits for each other's wills.


But there is the third vigilance, and that is the vigilance of striving for the habits of working, seeking work, and believing in the consciousness to the buck as it were stopping where it needs to, stopping here (and that's abstract difference the tea party wants to make philosophical). The third vigilance has a doubtful understanding for the temporality. We get up every morning usually not at the precisely same time; we also commit ourselves to projects with undetermined deadlines. Finally, the problem is to understand the objective temporality for the activity; it's a materialism which can put us to the temporality for subjective feelings in the first vigilance namely dying itself. Is subjective temporality possibly disparagingly discrete with a biological clock i the holistic concern; or is the objective temporality itself indifferently chronological with respect to the chronometer clock somewhere in England? Idealistically the problem still lies in my own subjective existing and it lies with the original problem of Conscience that I direct myself and my ideas on the clock vigilantly for time of working recomencement. Is it so important? My opinion is that some form of third vigilance does exist for all.


Oh yaah; I know what it was. The third vigilance could be called the end of the world vigilance.

Last edited by tgnostic; 11-15-2010 at 10:33 AM.. Reason: Add the subject of thought in my mind.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-23-2010, 08:32 AM
 
Location: Toronto, ON
2,332 posts, read 2,841,010 times
Reputation: 259
Yeah, but this thread was not closed. Dabbling in the phenomenology of Levinas, and somehow the anti-philosophical still changed to Philosophy. I'm not sure.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Religion and Spirituality
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top