Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Well, outside of Trinidad and Guyana, so it seems. Now Jamaica has a a deported radical known for his calls for violence citing the Koranic exhortation for Jihad.
Well, outside of Trinidad and Guyana, so it seems. Now Jamaica has a a deported radical known for his calls for violence citing the Koranic exhortation for Jihad.
Arabs own very nice islands in the Caribbean, Costa Myia has like a ten billion dollar dock for cruise ships and the entire island is Arab owned. Me and my wife were going to move there and live like kings. All you would have to do is take some medical classes, be like an ambulance driver and live like a king.
It appears to be rearing it's ugly head all over the world, it's getting pretty frightening.
I know. It's going to overshadow the race debate and a lot of other debates here in the future I predict. It's so hard to reconcile having a religion that has both wonderful people like Woodrow Li and horrible people in such large quantities. I don't see how it can't cause problems all over for both sides, the Muslims and the non-Muslims.
I believe the reason is that fundamentalism (or bibliolatry) is much harder for Christians because of the confusing Jewish concepts, and the contradictions yet anti-violence bend of the actual chosen writings. Islamic fundamentalism would be much clearer and with a stronger bend to accept violence and even deem it necessary and preplanned by God (Allah) for the "Mysterious Greater Good," there is more justification of the allowance of corruption in the powerful and vengeance appeasement in the Islamic texts.
I believe the reason is that fundamentalism (or bibliolatry) is much harder for Christians because of the confusing Jewish concepts, and the contradictions yet anti-violence bend of the actual chosen writings. Islamic fundamentalism would be much clearer and with a stronger bend to accept violence and even deem it necessary and preplanned by God (Allah) for the "Mysterious Greater Good," there is more justification of the allowance of corruption in the powerful and vengeance appeasement in the Islamic texts.
True. The blatantly pacifist statements of Jesus and John derail a lot of the violence is justified by the bible arguments.
True. The blatantly pacifist statements of Jesus and John derail a lot of the violence is justified by the bible arguments.
The Quran is much more nuanced about peace, the general message being "Muslims be peaceful except in times of war; In war, Allah makes everything as though lawful for you Muhammad."... lol when is war and why would there be a message in the Quran for Muhammad that doesn't apply to Muslims in general? Isn't war when ever anyone declares it (or secretly acts it out lol)? The violent imagery of the New Testament and blatant violent messages of the Old Testament can't often we squared very well with the scattered yet very direct pacifist messages from Jesus and Paul.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
