Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Real Estate > Renting
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-16-2011, 06:14 PM
 
Location: Bike to Surf!
3,078 posts, read 11,062,838 times
Reputation: 3023

Advertisements

Hello all. Thanks in advance to any knowledge anyone's willing to share.

This is a theoretical situation, but something that's likely to happen in the near future.

I own a detached single-family home in a nice suburb (20 minutes by car to downtown) of a major city.

I may need to move across the country soon, and I'd like to rent the property out rather than try to sell. Because I'll be thousands of miles away, I'll need to use a rental agency. All told, my expenses (not including maint. and utils.) for the house are about 1200/mo.

I've seen rentals of the same size in the area advertised from $1500 to more than $2000, and my property would probably come in on the high side of those. $1600 is probably a conservative estimate, or a price that ought to attract renters looking for a bargain.

My question is, how much of a fee/% can I expect a rental agency to take, and can I hope to break even going with a fire-and-forget agency (assuming I/they get decent tenants) that's going to handle most everything about the property for an owner who lives cross country.

Thanks for your responses. I'd really appreciate hearing from anyone who's been a landlord in MA, because that's where this property is, and we've got pretty tenant-favorable laws.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-16-2011, 06:21 PM
 
Location: Up above the world so high!
45,218 posts, read 100,712,871 times
Reputation: 40199
Quote:
Originally Posted by sponger42 View Post
Hello all. Thanks in advance to any knowledge anyone's willing to share.

This is a theoretical situation, but something that's likely to happen in the near future.

I own a detached single-family home in a nice suburb (20 minutes by car to downtown) of a major city.

I may need to move across the country soon, and I'd like to rent the property out rather than try to sell. Because I'll be thousands of miles away, I'll need to use a rental agency. All told, my expenses (not including maint. and utils.) for the house are about 1200/mo.

I've seen rentals of the same size in the area advertised from $1500 to more than $2000, and my property would probably come in on the high side of those. $1600 is probably a conservative estimate, or a price that ought to attract renters looking for a bargain.

My question is, how much of a fee/% can I expect a rental agency to take, and can I hope to break even going with a fire-and-forget agency (assuming I/they get decent tenants) that's going to handle most everything about the property for an owner who lives cross country.

Thanks for your responses. I'd really appreciate hearing from anyone who's been a landlord in MA, because that's where this property is, and we've got pretty tenant-favorable laws.

I think 15-20% is pretty standard, but that could vary depending on region of the country

Seems to me you are very wise to let a good management company handle this since you'll be so far. And it does sound like you will at least break even and get your mortgage paid
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-16-2011, 06:38 PM
 
Location: The Triad
34,088 posts, read 82,953,336 times
Reputation: 43661
Quote:
Originally Posted by sponger42 View Post
Can I Break Even Renting My Property Through an Agency?
If the numbers otherwise would allow you (or imply that they would) to do better than break even then kicking out a bit extra in fees for management shouldn't hurt too much. The real lesson or point is that NOT using a good PM operation is almost guaranteed to cost you more.

On the first point though is to learn all the costs associated before making any estimates.
eg: property insurance and property taxes will go up immediately as will water and sewer rates and consumption
Quote:
Thanks for your responses. I'd really appreciate hearing from anyone who's been a landlord in MA, because that's where this property is, and we've got pretty tenant-favorable laws.
Contact a landlord or property owners group near you and ask around.
Check the courts for frequency of filings and success when they do happen.

The best arrangements are those PMC's who will lease your home and in turn make their own deal with prospective tenants... in essence becoming a partner of sorts with you.
(going to court a lot is NOT the sign of a good PM... but success when it does happen is)

The thing to watch for are deals based on occupancy and trouble free operation and NOT deals which give the PM a right to charge separately for every little thing that happens in the course of securing and keeping good tenants in place. A extra charge to handle an unusual occurrence? Sure. The routine stuff? No.

hth

Last edited by MrRational; 11-16-2011 at 06:52 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-16-2011, 07:03 PM
 
Location: Tempe, Arizona
4,511 posts, read 13,578,860 times
Reputation: 2201
Typical fee around here is 10%. You may also have separate costs for listing/advertising the home to acquire tenants. You should call a few companies to get a feel for the prevailing rate in your area.

To determine if you can at least break even or not, you need to consider all your possible ongoing expenses vs your rental income. Consider mortgage payment, insurance, taxes (including any special city rental tax), vacancy and repair reserves, management fees, etc. Utilities such as water, electric, sewer, etc should be paid by the tenant.

Mr Rational - why would property taxes "go up immediately"? Maybe that's a local concern? Would depend on when homes are assessed, and if a rental would have any bearing on the assessment.

Last edited by rjrcm; 11-16-2011 at 07:35 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-16-2011, 07:25 PM
 
Location: El Dorado Hills, CA
3,720 posts, read 9,997,648 times
Reputation: 3927
Fees here are 6-8%. I guess it's also very local. Call some of the companies and ask.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-16-2011, 08:01 PM
 
Location: The Triad
34,088 posts, read 82,953,336 times
Reputation: 43661
Quote:
Originally Posted by rjrcm View Post
Mr Rational - why would property taxes "go up immediately"?
Non-owner occupied vs owner occupied.
Taxes and insurance will both cost more.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-16-2011, 08:21 PM
 
Location: Tempe, Arizona
4,511 posts, read 13,578,860 times
Reputation: 2201
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrRational View Post
Non-owner occupied vs owner occupied.
Taxes and insurance will both cost more.
Again, I think that depends on location. I have rental properties. Owner occupied or not has no impact on our property tax assessment. And if it did, it would likely drive the valuation down, not up. I do have to pay a relatively small city rental sales tax, so including that, combined taxes are higher than non-rental.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-17-2011, 06:08 AM
 
Location: Baltimore
1,757 posts, read 5,137,534 times
Reputation: 1201
Actually my insurance dropped about $600 since renting it as I just have to cover dwelling and fire.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-17-2011, 07:02 AM
 
Location: Tempe, Arizona
4,511 posts, read 13,578,860 times
Reputation: 2201
Quote:
Originally Posted by davecj View Post
Actually my insurance dropped about $600 since renting it as I just have to cover dwelling and fire.
Right, all you need is a landlord policy. The tenant will need to get their own insurance for their possessions.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-17-2011, 07:13 AM
 
Location: Mount Laurel
4,187 posts, read 11,928,108 times
Reputation: 3514
Quote:
Originally Posted by rjrcm View Post
Again, I think that depends on location. I have rental properties. Owner occupied or not has no impact on our property tax assessment. And if it did, it would likely drive the valuation down, not up. I do have to pay a relatively small city rental sales tax, so including that, combined taxes are higher than non-rental.
Very true.

OP: You have to find out all the regulations from the city/county and HOA requirements for renting.

I'll give you an example. In Philadelphia city, you whould have to use a property management or similiar in order to rent out your property if you do not reside in the city. With just 1 property and being so far away, you may want to reconsider and possibly sell it instead of having to be concern about it half way across the country.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Real Estate > Renting

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top