Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Real Estate > Renting
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-06-2019, 05:37 PM
 
Location: Panama City, FL
3,109 posts, read 2,020,046 times
Reputation: 6872

Advertisements

From the links you've listed, I was able to find my way to Univ of CO's site:

Locate Statutes - How do I Find Colorado Revised Statutes? - LibGuides at University of Colorado Colorado Springs

The search feature brought me to lexis to search for L-T:

https://advance.lexis.com/container?...b-fb26eeda1ef2

Many of the laws are in Title 38 (as someone mentioned above), but many are not. It's 10 pages of varying laws... unsure if it contains all.

I'll still make some calls... might be easier than expected to get a copy all in 1 spot, maybe not. But, I'll update in the event it helps someone down the line.

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-06-2019, 06:04 PM
 
Location: Silicon Valley
18,813 posts, read 32,565,794 times
Reputation: 38578
https://www.colorado.gov/pacific/sit...t%20Rights.pdf
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-06-2019, 07:42 PM
 
Location: Panama City, FL
3,109 posts, read 2,020,046 times
Reputation: 6872
Quote:
Originally Posted by NoMoreSnowForMe View Post
Thanks, Snow. That's just an overview of some of the main laws... I've seen it. This is what's so frustrating... bits & pieces of laws in varying places.

I appreciate the help. I'll make some calls to see if I can get some guidance & report back.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-07-2019, 09:32 AM
 
Location: Charlotte, NC
4,761 posts, read 7,845,216 times
Reputation: 5328
Quote:
Originally Posted by FIREin2016 View Post
You do not have to get permission, you are correct. The tenant can force you away and file a restraining order. The cops serve you and you must stay away.

Just talk to any number of ex-husbands/boyfriends out there to see how easy it is. They are automatically issued, virtually instantaneously, and you have to show up and tell a Judge why it should not be. In the meantime, it's a criminal offense to contact the person on the order. They can contact you, you cannot contact them. That is generally true in all 50 states.

The tenant can get an order likely for free, and you have to pay money if you want an attorney to represent you.

This is a case where you have the right, and are within the law, but you need to bow to the tenant or kick them out. I kick them out, or skip renting to low-quality tenants in the first place.

I'd like to see an actual example of this happening. Please link one. Otherwise, I'm hoisting the BS flag.

Restraining orders are not granted because you are inconvenienced. If a landlord gives notice of entry and a tenant prevents that entry, in every lease I've ever seen that is a breach/default and will subject the tenant to eviction.

ROs are for protection, and without any threat, you arent getting one on a landlord. It just doesnt work that way. Even pro-tenant judges and magistrates will look at the petitioner like they're an idiot. And a judge or magistrate who would issue one based on a landlord trying to legally enter needs to be putting resumes out there because their legal career is drawing to a close. There is no legal basis or precedent that would allow for this.

Now, everything us different if the landlord has communicated threats or exhibited some other action that would necessitate a protective order. But peacefully attempting legal entry does not meet those requirements.


Added: using ex-partners as a basis for your theory is not similar in this case. In those instances there is usually a presumption or threat of domestic violence.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-08-2019, 07:28 AM
 
486 posts, read 418,209 times
Reputation: 559
Quote:
Originally Posted by spankys bbq View Post
I'd like to see an actual example of this happening. Please link one. Otherwise, I'm hoisting the BS flag.
Agreed.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-08-2019, 02:56 PM
 
Location: Panama City, FL
3,109 posts, read 2,020,046 times
Reputation: 6872
Default Update: Some links

Okay, I got a few links from a Regional Property Manager today. Some include links others have so kindly listed (so I didn't relist them)... others are new. As another poster said, they're not all included in 1 block on 1 site, which is unfortunate. Still, these are useful & I'll buy the Nolo Press book to fill in the gaps & make it easier to have a reference on hand.


Thanks again, Everyone.


https://www.hud.gov/states/colorado/...g/tenantrights


Have a great weekend.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-09-2019, 06:05 AM
 
Location: North Central Florida
784 posts, read 732,527 times
Reputation: 1046
Quote:
Originally Posted by spankys bbq View Post
I'd like to see an actual example of this happening. Please link one. Otherwise, I'm hoisting the BS flag.

Restraining orders are not granted because you are inconvenienced. If a landlord gives notice of entry and a tenant prevents that entry, in every lease I've ever seen that is a breach/default and will subject the tenant to eviction.

ROs are for protection, and without any threat, you arent getting one on a landlord. It just doesnt work that way. Even pro-tenant judges and magistrates will look at the petitioner like they're an idiot. And a judge or magistrate who would issue one based on a landlord trying to legally enter needs to be putting resumes out there because their legal career is drawing to a close. There is no legal basis or precedent that would allow for this.

Now, everything us different if the landlord has communicated threats or exhibited some other action that would necessitate a protective order. But peacefully attempting legal entry does not meet those requirements.

Added: using ex-partners as a basis for your theory is not similar in this case. In those instances there is usually a presumption or threat of domestic violence.
You are clueless on how restraining orders work. An order for protection (OFP) is for ex-partners. A restraining order is filed on neighbors, filing on the cops, HOAs, etc. You do not need proof to apply for one, and even an email you do not like is enough of a threat. A temporary one nearly always gets granted, until the details can be worked out.

It has happened. I had a Section 8 tenant that was a nightmare. Drug dealer and prostitution. Felon BFs, extra pets, etc.

I have a 2-yd dumpster that I used on a commercial/mix property, and she did not want me coming around to use 'her' dumpster, even though I paid for it. I was putting construction debris in it every few days as I was rehabbing properties. It was in a parking lot that held ~8 cars. She told me to stay away and leave her alone. Looking back, she was paranoid about all her 'activities' getting found out. She was evicted 4 times in the next two years when she moved out.

I won at the hearing and received a dismissal, but had to stay away for a couple of weeks. The order was then expunged. It costs $7K for my attorney, mainly because I asked too many questions. She had a free attorney, and the tenant or the attorney did not even appear.

I worked with the Section 8 office and had her moved out ~6 weeks after she moved in. All it takes is a accusation, about anything. A judge issues the order, and figures it out at the hearing two weeks later. If you violate the order, it's a criminal violation. They bring you to jail. I stayed away and avoided all contact. I did not even return her phone calls. Many ex-husbands can attest to that.

That was my last Section 8 tenant, and my last low-income tenant. Terminated the rest of my section 8 leases as they came due. I made major changes to my processes and now leave the subpar renters to others.


Quote:
The restraining order may be obtained with little or no evidence, and is temporary in nature, initially. ...Since the RO is considered an emergency provision, and curtails certain freedoms without due process, a subsequent hearing is scheduled.
https://www.quora.com/Is-filing-a-fa...-order-illegal

Last edited by FIREin2016; 02-09-2019 at 06:21 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-09-2019, 12:58 PM
 
Location: North Idaho
32,680 posts, read 48,185,877 times
Reputation: 78546
Quote:
Originally Posted by spankys bbq View Post
I'd like to see an actual example of this happening. Please link one. Otherwise, I'm hoisting the BS flag..........

I've heard of it, always while a tenant is fighting eviction. The landlord just applies to get it lifted. It's annoying and it costs a lawyer's fee, but it won't stick.



Conventional wisdom in the landlord community is that when a tenant has to be evicted to just stay the heck far away from them while the courts do their job and get them out. Don't do anything to escalate the situation and worry about damage after the judge orders them thrown out into the gutter. There is nothing to gain by checking in on them.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-09-2019, 07:38 PM
 
Location: North Central Florida
784 posts, read 732,527 times
Reputation: 1046
Quote:
Originally Posted by oregonwoodsmoke View Post
I've heard of it, always while a tenant is fighting eviction. The landlord just applies to get it lifted. It's annoying and it costs a lawyer's fee, but it won't stick.

Conventional wisdom in the landlord community is that when a tenant has to be evicted to just stay the heck far away from them while the courts do their job and get them out. Don't do anything to escalate the situation and worry about damage after the judge orders them thrown out into the gutter. There is nothing to gain by checking in on them.
100% correct. I am always amused about how some LLs want to force there way into a rental, just to inspect or whatever, even when the tenant doesn't want it.

You may have the right to enter, but it will never be good if you have an adverse situation.

I nave have an issue with better quality tenants. It's only the low quality ones that cause issues. Once I figured out a way to eliminate and avoid them, my profits soared.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-09-2019, 07:43 PM
 
Location: Silicon Valley
18,813 posts, read 32,565,794 times
Reputation: 38578
It seems you need specific laws for a specific situation. If you are more specific, maybe someone here can help you with more specific advise.

Best of luck to you.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Real Estate > Renting

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:53 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top