Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Retirement
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 05-12-2015, 06:36 AM
 
17,401 posts, read 11,982,916 times
Reputation: 16155

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by freemkt View Post
Personally, I think those who had capacity to save and invest - but did not save and did not invest - should take a hit before those who lacked capacity to save and invest.
You would decidedly fit in that first category. A college degree, and 30 years to build a career. Yet you did not save and did not invest.

The only ones that fit into that second category would be the truly handicapped and mentally ill.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-12-2015, 07:44 AM
 
Location: CT
3,440 posts, read 2,529,279 times
Reputation: 4639
Quote:
Originally Posted by ringwise View Post
You would decidedly fit in that first category. A college degree, and 30 years to build a career. Yet you did not save and did not invest.

The only ones that fit into that second category would be the truly handicapped and mentally ill.
IMHO- SS should be for those who worked and contributed to the system, people who did not and are in need should be funded from a separate program. That's not greed or selfishness, it's proper accounting.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-12-2015, 09:21 AM
 
Location: NC Piedmont
4,023 posts, read 3,801,062 times
Reputation: 6550
Quote:
Originally Posted by snowtired14 View Post
IMHO- SS should be for those who worked and contributed to the system, people who did not and are in need should be funded from a separate program. That's not greed or selfishness, it's proper accounting.
The first recipients didn't contribute a dime. Proper accounting went out the window a long time ago. IMO it should not be viewed as an investment ; it's insurance against out living your money.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-12-2015, 11:14 AM
 
Location: CT
3,440 posts, read 2,529,279 times
Reputation: 4639
Quote:
Originally Posted by CarvedTones View Post
The first recipients didn't contribute a dime. Proper accounting went out the window a long time ago. IMO it should not be viewed as an investment ; it's insurance against out living your money.
Don't know where you got your info, but in 1940 when the first benefits were paid out, the ratio of workers to beneficiaries was 159:1, there would have been plenty of money available without borrowing a dime. Of course proper accounting went out the window, but only after congress started raiding the SS piggybank and using it for things it wasn't meant to be used for.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-12-2015, 12:16 PM
 
17,401 posts, read 11,982,916 times
Reputation: 16155
Quote:
Originally Posted by snowtired14 View Post
IMHO- SS should be for those who worked and contributed to the system, people who did not and are in need should be funded from a separate program. That's not greed or selfishness, it's proper accounting.
I agree with you partly. But as SS stands for Social Security, I don't have a problem having it used to support children or spouses whose breadwinner has died after paying into the system.

As for "proper accounting", it is not, and has never been an "account" but rather an insurance program. And there has never been proper accounting on it, in any case.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-12-2015, 01:02 PM
 
Location: NC Piedmont
4,023 posts, read 3,801,062 times
Reputation: 6550
Quote:
Originally Posted by snowtired14 View Post
Don't know where you got your info, but in 1940 when the first benefits were paid out, the ratio of workers to beneficiaries was 159:1, there would have been plenty of money available without borrowing a dime. Of course proper accounting went out the window, but only after congress started raiding the SS piggybank and using it for things it wasn't meant to be used for.
I am confused. It sounds like you are agreeing with me that the first recipients didn't contribute but at the same time questioning my source of information.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-24-2015, 05:07 PM
 
1,042 posts, read 875,003 times
Reputation: 6639
We saved and lost it all looking for a miracle for one of our kids [which, we basicly did. We are newly retired, but this is what our expenses are so far

[1] putting $500 away a month for cruises, Christmas, grandkids, eating out once a month, etc]
[2] $200 a month put away for whatever breaks and needs to be fixed
[3] $400 a month for food [including chicken, bees, and garden supplies]
[4] $300 a month for car insurance, phone, internet, re taxes, house insurance
[5] $300 a month for health care
[6] $125 for utilities
[7] $100 a month for classes, fun activities, fishing
[8] for whatever
We spend about $200 a month on jewelry supplies, but bring in at least $800 a month from jewelry sales, which are included in income. Neither of us are receiving social security as yet. My husband has applied for ssdi, but you never know. we profit about $1,000 in rent, $135 in pension, $500 of disabled sons $1200 a month ssdi [ biological parent died when he was a baby] and a little bit here and there for baked goods [ thank you cottage laws]

The rest we tuck away/
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-25-2015, 12:34 PM
 
409 posts, read 485,072 times
Reputation: 829
Our total is around $27,000.

• Electricity $125.00
• Water 15.00
• Trash 19.43
• Phone/Internet 78.33
• Cell phone 8.33
• Netflix 8.62
• Gardener 65.00
• House Ins 48.88
• Auto Ins 44.50
• Prop tax 71.00
• Auto registration 7.40
• Gasoline 40.00
• Auto maintenance 50.00
• Food and non-food grocery 450.00
• Haircut 12.00
• Misc 150.00 (house and garden)
• Sub total: $1,193.49
• Prescriptions 120.00
• Health Ins 860.00
• Other medical (co-pays, co-insurance and deductible) $50
Total: $2,223.49 ($26,682/yr.)

We live in Florida, so our A/C is on all the time in the hot months. We have a one story 1,370 sf 3 bedroom 2 bath home that was built in 2007. Our highest bill was around $140 and our lowest around $60. It averages out to $125 per month. We set the thermostat to between 77 and 79 during the day and 76 at night. We are very comfortable in that range.

Our cell phone is a prepaid that we keep with us in case of emergency when we are out and about. We pay $100/yr. for 1,000 minutes, which is plenty. Our landline has free nationwide calling.

We have a gardener because my husband is disabled. We have 1/3 of an acre lot, so I think it's well worth it.

The misc. amount is a there-abouts. Some months are less, some more. It covers things like a battery for the TV remote control, cut flowers for the dining room table, plants for our front garden, potting soil, just the typical kind of house and garden expenses that come up.

Our biggest single expense is medical care. We will see some savings once we hit Medicare age in about a year and half. We plan to go with a high deductible Part F and a Part D for prescriptions. Plus, my husband is in the process of changing over to all generic medications, which will bring the cost for prescriptions down to $40/month.

We bought this house recently and put a new HVAC unit in. We also replaced the stove, had gutters put in and had some minor maintenance done. We have savings put away for house maintenance and replacement of any large appliances and for large expenses such as a new roof.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-25-2015, 03:41 PM
 
Location: Gulf Coast
1,458 posts, read 1,170,885 times
Reputation: 3098
This seems to be the appropriate place to put this. Interesting experience recently, conversation with Nephew (about 50 years old). Told him DH was retiring in 3 years but I was getting my SS now and he was letting his grow a bit. I was taken aback when he started sputtering about the "SS is going to run out and I will never get any of it". But he didn't seem angry at the politicians or the economy, it seemed directed at us for figuring out how to get a little more out of our SS!

Or course, I immediately told him we wouldn't break even till DH is something like 81 1/2 years old, so it all might be a wash. I'm still a little shocked about it. This guy is usually very nice and pleasant and friendly towards us. I guess I hit a nerve...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-25-2015, 06:47 PM
 
Location: Los Angeles area
14,016 posts, read 20,914,319 times
Reputation: 32530
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pat Answers View Post
This seems to be the appropriate place to put this. Interesting experience recently, conversation with Nephew (about 50 years old). Told him DH was retiring in 3 years but I was getting my SS now and he was letting his grow a bit. I was taken aback when he started sputtering about the "SS is going to run out and I will never get any of it". But he didn't seem angry at the politicians or the economy, it seemed directed at us for figuring out how to get a little more out of our SS!

Or course, I immediately told him we wouldn't break even till DH is something like 81 1/2 years old, so it all might be a wash. I'm still a little shocked about it. This guy is usually very nice and pleasant and friendly towards us. I guess I hit a nerve...
Yep, it's sometimes bizarre what will rattle some people's cages. His problem, of course, not yours. Perhaps the nerve you hit is his anxiety about whether there will be cuts in SS by the time he receives it. The irritation was misdirected at you, proof, perhaps, of some irrationality on his part.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Retirement

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:50 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top