Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Social Security in the long term is only 70% funded. It would never be cut to 50%. Retirees would guiotinne all of Congress if that got voted in. The rich don't want to pay the employer side of a payroll tax hike and they don't want the $118,500 earned income cap lifted or taxes on unearned income like was done for Medicare. That will delay enacting the recommendations of the bipartisan commission for a number of years. Right now, this is all political posturing. Medicare is the program more likely to see big reforms.
You are right, but a number of politicians want to cut Ss
Name one.
Some Republicans want to privatize Social Security but that wouldn't apply to anyone close to collecting. I doubt anyone over the age of 45 would be impacted.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.