Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California > San Francisco - Oakland
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-17-2017, 05:57 PM
 
Location: California
1,424 posts, read 1,639,254 times
Reputation: 3149

Advertisements

Not sure what that means, but it could suggest that real estate in the city has a lot more room to go. As you can see from the chart below, San Francisco is not among the top 15 most expensive cities. It could be a function of high income in SF, low income in the Asian cities, or per sq. ft. prices in SF that are significantly lower than global peers.

Anyway, it was just a surprising and interesting finding

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/artic...rdable-housing
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-17-2017, 06:21 PM
 
10,920 posts, read 6,912,422 times
Reputation: 4942
Quote:
Originally Posted by HappyinCali View Post
Not sure what that means, but it could suggest that real estate in the city has a lot more room to go. As you can see from the chart below, San Francisco is not among the top 15 most expensive cities. It could be a function of high income in SF, low income in the Asian cities, or per sq. ft. prices in SF that are significantly lower than global peers.

Anyway, it was just a surprising and interesting finding

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/artic...rdable-housing
I think it could mean that...and that's kind of scary.

Although this is more about affordability in relation to local wages, right? And less about actual raw cost of housing (which SF could be much higher in globally?), right?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-17-2017, 06:49 PM
 
Location: California
1,424 posts, read 1,639,254 times
Reputation: 3149
Quote:
Originally Posted by HockeyMac18 View Post
I think it could mean that...and that's kind of scary.

Although this is more about affordability in relation to local wages, right? And less about actual raw cost of housing (which SF could be much higher in globally?), right?
yes, this is about affordability. Shanghai and Mumbai are likely the least relevant comp from that perspective, but Melbourne, Sydney, London, Paris, Tokyo and Singapore all have wages that are likely similar to SF, so those are probably more relevant.

What you see in Tokyo and Singapore are apartments that in absolute amount are comparable to SF, but are significantly higher on a per sq. foot basis and therefore much smaller.

Tokyo is especially notorious for small apartments. Hong Kong and Singapore apartments are also known to be pretty small, although I don't feel like looking up the data right now.

Here is a decent chart on global per sq. ft prices for expensive real estate

http://luxurydefined.christiesreales...ome_Prices.jpg
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-17-2017, 06:51 PM
 
Location: Marin County, CA
787 posts, read 644,585 times
Reputation: 869
Is that supposed to be some sort of consolation?

COL in the bay area is ridiculous and inexusable. Period. Even if you can afford it, it doesn't make sense.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-17-2017, 08:10 PM
 
351 posts, read 342,396 times
Reputation: 764
Quote:
Originally Posted by HappyinCali View Post
Not sure what that means, but it could suggest that real estate in the city has a lot more room to go. As you can see from the chart below, San Francisco is not among the top 15 most expensive cities. It could be a function of high income in SF, low income in the Asian cities, or per sq. ft. prices in SF that are significantly lower than global peers.

Anyway, it was just a surprising and interesting finding

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/artic...rdable-housing
This is not really surprising given income inequality in those locations...the article only talks about price / income ratio, and nothing about actual pricing. A simple search will be obvious to show that price/sq ft in SF is definitely not lower than in most Asian cities.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-18-2017, 06:56 AM
 
4,369 posts, read 3,724,709 times
Reputation: 2479
Quote:
Originally Posted by Commonproject View Post
This is not really surprising given income inequality in those locations...the article only talks about price / income ratio, and nothing about actual pricing. A simple search will be obvious to show that price/sq ft in SF is definitely not lower than in most Asian cities.
Maybe we should set up shell companies and buy their real estate in revenge.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-18-2017, 07:35 AM
 
882 posts, read 688,916 times
Reputation: 905
That's great news for those that were diligent and persevered home ownership. Other than the YIMBYs who want government controlled socialism to be put in place, most home owners living here will be happy with this news.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-18-2017, 08:32 AM
 
Location: California
1,424 posts, read 1,639,254 times
Reputation: 3149
Quote:
Originally Posted by Commonproject View Post
This is not really surprising given income inequality in those locations...the article only talks about price / income ratio, and nothing about actual pricing. A simple search will be obvious to show that price/sq ft in SF is definitely not lower than in most Asian cities.
yes I posted that info in my second post
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-20-2017, 11:55 AM
 
Location: Palo Alto, CA
901 posts, read 1,168,376 times
Reputation: 1169
compared to major global cities, sf is a small one-industry town and not a capital. just not comparable.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-21-2017, 10:56 PM
 
Location: California
1,424 posts, read 1,639,254 times
Reputation: 3149
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chuck5000 View Post
compared to major global cities, sf is a small one-industry town and not a capital. just not comparable.
Lol, no it is not. Tech was the third major contributor to the city's GDP two years ago. Tourism and healthcare were the two biggest. SF is also a major biotech hub
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California > San Francisco - Oakland

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:43 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top