Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I'd like to see what they were announcing in their predictions. Was it a release along the lines of "there is no possibility of a major earthquake" or was it "there is little possibility of a major earthquake".
If I recall there was an Italian scientist that gained a lot of notoriety for accurately predicting an earthquake a few years back. There is a lot of competition of amongst scientists for their own self interests and perhaps that is what the courts were looking at here. If they are confidentially predicting there will be no major earthquake and there is no earthquake then everyone thinks they are they are greatest thing since slice bread.
I wonder if what thecoalman said is right and there was a little cottage industry of scientists making bogus predictions and it finally came back to bite them.
If that were the case though, I would much rather have "fraud" be the charge rather than manslaughter.
Though if they were just innocent scientists then yes, this is an appalling case of ignorance of the masses. I hope it gets thrown out in a higher court.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.