Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Science and Technology
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-25-2020, 05:45 PM
 
Location: Fortaleza, Northeast of Brazil
3,989 posts, read 6,793,025 times
Reputation: 2465

Advertisements

Just wondering if that would be feasible...

We could use heating elements like those in electric showers to heat sand using electricity from photovoltaic solar panels, during day hours. That super hot sand could be stored in some tanks with thermal insulation, to be used at night time for boiling water to generate steam and turn a turbine to generate electricity.

Sand is so cheap, and can be heated to temperatures above 500, 600, 700 degrees Celsius without melting.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-25-2020, 06:28 PM
 
23,600 posts, read 70,412,676 times
Reputation: 49268
Would it be possible? I suppose so, but it would be incredibly inefficient.

Whether a substance remains solid or not is irrelevant to storage at scale. To the contrary, phase change (from solid to liquid, liquid to solid, liquid to vapor, etc.) usually stores or releases large amounts of thermal energy. Boiling water to create pressurized vapor (steam) is an example. It isn't that water vapor is magic, what makes it worthwhile is that there can be huge amounts of it easily produced under pressures sufficient to push turbine wheels around or pistons in steam engines.

Something akin to what you suggest for thermal storage was proposed years ago using sodium sulfate:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sodium...hermal_storage
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-25-2020, 06:53 PM
 
Location: Fortaleza, Northeast of Brazil
3,989 posts, read 6,793,025 times
Reputation: 2465
Quote:
Originally Posted by harry chickpea View Post
Would it be possible? I suppose so, but it would be incredibly inefficient.

Whether a substance remains solid or not is irrelevant to storage at scale. To the contrary, phase change (from solid to liquid, liquid to solid, liquid to vapor, etc.) usually stores or releases large amounts of thermal energy. Boiling water to create pressurized vapor (steam) is an example. It isn't that water vapor is magic, what makes it worthwhile is that there can be huge amounts of it easily produced under pressures sufficient to push turbine wheels around or pistons in steam engines.

Something akin to what you suggest for thermal storage was proposed years ago using sodium sulfate:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sodium...hermal_storage

Probably inefficient, yes...

But this video shows that it's really possible to boil water with hot sand:




Maybe batteries are a cheaper way of storing solar energy for night use, I have no idea of the costs involved in this hot sand approach.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-25-2020, 07:03 PM
 
Location: Brackenwood
9,981 posts, read 5,681,961 times
Reputation: 22138
Concrete makes a better thermal battery than loose material like sand. I've seen houses with a concrete floor and a bunch of south-facing windows to allow the floor to absorb the heat from the sun in the morning and then radiate it back through the house throughout the afternoon. Put an overhang over the windows so the sun doesn't shine through the windows in the summer when the sun is higher and it's all good. Concrete floors are also amenable to in-floor heating systems.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-29-2020, 06:54 AM
 
Location: Fortaleza, Northeast of Brazil
3,989 posts, read 6,793,025 times
Reputation: 2465
If thermoelectric generator modules (TEGs) based on Peltier effect or Seeback effect were cheaper, this approach could have some viability. But it would require a great cut in the costs of TEGs compared to present day costs.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-29-2020, 12:00 PM
 
Location: Not far from Fairbanks, AK
20,293 posts, read 37,183,750 times
Reputation: 16397
Quote:
Originally Posted by MalaMan View Post
Just wondering if that would be feasible...

We could use heating elements like those in electric showers to heat sand using electricity from photovoltaic solar panels, during day hours. That super hot sand could be stored in some tanks with thermal insulation, to be used at night time for boiling water to generate steam and turn a turbine to generate electricity.

Sand is so cheap, and can be heated to temperatures above 500, 600, 700 degrees Celsius without melting.
Sand also cools rapidly depending on ambient temperature. You would have to insulate the hot sand all the way around for it to reduce the rate of cooling, but that would be too expensive and cumbersome to accomplish. Lets say that you have a large container full of hot sand, perhaps a tank that holds 1,000 gallons of sand. Are you aware of how heavy sand can be? The average weight of 5-gallon bucket full of sand is around 45-65 pounds. How are you going to warm the sand inside the tank after it cools?

Instead of storing hot sand inside the house, use heat pumps in the hot sand to bring the heat to your home.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-29-2020, 01:20 PM
 
Location: Fortaleza, Northeast of Brazil
3,989 posts, read 6,793,025 times
Reputation: 2465
Quote:
Originally Posted by RayinAK View Post
Sand also cools rapidly depending on ambient temperature. You would have to insulate the hot sand all the way around for it to reduce the rate of cooling, but that would be too expensive and cumbersome to accomplish. Lets say that you have a large container full of hot sand, perhaps a tank that holds 1,000 gallons of sand. Are you aware of how heavy sand can be? The average weight of 5-gallon bucket full of sand is around 45-65 pounds. How are you going to warm the sand inside the tank after it cools?
Probably a large tank with thermal insulation would be needed to store the hot sand, and prevent it from cooling.

To warm the sand inside the tank I guess it would be needed to have the heating elements (like those used in electric showers) permanently inside the tank. A small orifice in the tank wall would be needed as a way in for the power cables that would supply the electricity for the heating elements.

For recovering the thermal energy and turning it back into electricity at night I guess the best idea would be using thermoelectric generator modules (TEGs) based on Peltier effect or Seeback effect. But they are still too expensive and too inefficient in 2020.

It's just speculation, I can't imagine all the possible drawbacks of this approach.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-29-2020, 01:29 PM
 
Location: Fortaleza, Northeast of Brazil
3,989 posts, read 6,793,025 times
Reputation: 2465
The main advantages of sand are:

- it's very cheap

- it can be heated to more than 700 or 800 degrees Celsius without melting
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-29-2020, 02:24 PM
 
Location: Lahaina, Hi.
6,384 posts, read 4,831,112 times
Reputation: 11326
Quote:
Originally Posted by MalaMan View Post
The main advantages of sand are:

- it's very cheap

- it can be heated to more than 700 or 800 degrees Celsius without melting
When you are on a beach covered with hot sand, you only have to kick downward about two inches to hit cool sand. This indicates that sand would not be a very good storage medium. Concrete heats much deeper, but a liquid like water probably trumps them both for thermal storage.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-29-2020, 05:20 PM
 
Location: Fortaleza, Northeast of Brazil
3,989 posts, read 6,793,025 times
Reputation: 2465
Quote:
Originally Posted by Futuremauian View Post
When you are on a beach covered with hot sand, you only have to kick downward about two inches to hit cool sand. This indicates that sand would not be a very good storage medium. Concrete heats much deeper, but a liquid like water probably trumps them both for thermal storage.
The big problem with water is that if you heat it above 100 degrees Celsius on normal atmospheric pressure it becomes a gas, and dealing with a gas is much more complicated. Water at 98 or 99 degrees Celsius could be a thermal storage medium, but with sand you can have much higher temperatures, even one thousand degrees maybe....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Science and Technology

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top