Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Science and Technology
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 06-13-2023, 08:41 AM
 
Location: Florida
2,026 posts, read 2,777,078 times
Reputation: 1382

Advertisements

Have you read peer reviewed journals only to find that the "data" in it is absolutely useless for your own research?
Have you spent countless hours reading a scientific or engineering book, only to find out you have not been able to learn anything useful from it?

Not just a few instances. Most journals, articles, conference papers and books produced by the scientific community seems to serve a purpose of power demonstration for investors and donors, but does not serve the reader (scientist or engineer). There is nothing to be learned from most sci/eng books, they were not made for that purpose. If they even attempt to educate, it goes towards academic ideas, not towards usable practical guidelines. For example, they talk about XYZ technology. But they don't talk about how I the reader can implement that technology at my employer's product.

Most publishers now prefer the power demo articles/books over useful or meritocratic writings. This is due to credentialism and status in the scientific "community". It is 99% politics and 1% science.
This whole arrangement doesn't produce new methods or products for the public, rather it only produces "social status" to some people, in a pyramid scheme.
How did we come to this?
Why most people play along with it?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-13-2023, 11:16 PM
 
5,527 posts, read 3,253,078 times
Reputation: 7764
Quote:
Originally Posted by buenos View Post
How did we come to this?
I'm sure scientists would love to publish meaningful results. The ultimate source of the problem is that the low-hanging fruit has been picked in a lot of disciplines, and new discoveries require lots of money. That money corrupts.

Quote:
Why most people play along with it?
There's a weird culture in academia that if you drop out and do something else, you are a failure. A failure who makes three to four times what you made in research, for less work . The esteemed minds of research would do well to study some economics and understand how labor markets work.

The youngest generation of researchers actually seems clued in, and they are dropping out of the rat race and heading for greener pastures in industry or - gasp - doing something totally not in a research capacity.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Science and Technology

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top