Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Science and Technology > Space
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-06-2015, 10:31 AM
 
65 posts, read 121,541 times
Reputation: 59

Advertisements

Does the Big Bang imply the existence of a Creator or creators?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-06-2015, 06:05 PM
 
Location: Pacific 🌉 °N, 🌄°W
11,761 posts, read 7,263,697 times
Reputation: 7528
No
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-06-2015, 06:37 PM
 
48,502 posts, read 96,877,697 times
Reputation: 18304
It makes on statement basically. Even the theory itself has changed over time.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-07-2015, 12:19 AM
 
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
11,025 posts, read 5,991,147 times
Reputation: 5703
In my humble opinion, no. I'm not saying I am ruling it out but rather that the Big Bang itself does not imply anything.

Last edited by 303Guy; 07-07-2015 at 01:06 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-07-2015, 01:35 PM
 
Location: North of Canada, but not the Arctic
21,147 posts, read 19,729,843 times
Reputation: 25679
It implies that some action must have happened to initiate the Big Bang, which implies that some thinking being must have taken that action. One could argue that it is possible that the Big Bang was initiated all by itself, but something would have had to have been in place for the Big Bang to be able initiate itself. Could matter or the self-initiated creation of matter come out of nothing from nowhere?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-07-2015, 01:39 PM
 
Location: SC
8,793 posts, read 8,168,172 times
Reputation: 12992
Quote:
Originally Posted by Retroit View Post
It implies that some action must have happened to initiate the Big Bang, which implies that some thinking being must have taken that action. One could argue that it is possible that the Big Bang was initiated all by itself, but something would have had to have been in place for the Big Bang to be able initiate itself. Could matter or the self-initiated creation of matter come out of nothing from nowhere?
And from where did this "thinking being" spring?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-08-2015, 02:50 AM
 
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
11,025 posts, read 5,991,147 times
Reputation: 5703
Quote:
Could matter or the self-initiated creation of matter come out of nothing from nowhere?
Why would the creation of matter have to have come out of nothing?
Quote:
... which implies that some thinking being must have taken that action.
How so?

The pre-big bang spacetime condition is not something one would want to play around with in a laboratory. I would be inclined to suggest that if the big bang was indeed initiated by a thinking being, that being would be history.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-08-2015, 03:30 AM
 
508 posts, read 663,680 times
Reputation: 1401
Quote:
Originally Posted by RisingSun361 View Post
Does the Big Bang imply the existence of a Creator or creators?
No. Not any more than bears imply the existence of Winnie ther Pooh.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-08-2015, 04:20 AM
 
35,309 posts, read 52,323,443 times
Reputation: 30999
Quote:
Originally Posted by RisingSun361 View Post
Does the Big Bang imply the existence of a Creator or creators?
Elaborate on the basis for this line of thinking.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-08-2015, 10:55 AM
 
23,601 posts, read 70,436,018 times
Reputation: 49277
Please don't encourage this thread devolving into religion. Since it hasn't been locked or moved or deleted, I'll respond briefly.

The Winnie the Pooh reference is a lot more accurate than it might seem at first glance. The error in the OP is in attempting to extend causality, which is a product of the internal structure of the universe, and extend it outside the boundaries of that construct. A corollary would be a goldfish in a bowl positing the existence of a giant goldfish who created the bowl and water.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Science and Technology > Space

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:22 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top