Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Education > Teaching
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 11-30-2016, 09:41 AM
 
280 posts, read 250,584 times
Reputation: 351

Advertisements

New teachers are definitely underpaid but on the flip side experienced teachers make can easily crack 100K. Furthermore, their retirement is a joke. It is very back end heavy and most teachers don't get close to a full pension. Overall, I think it is a fair deal.

source Antiquated Pension Plans Are A Poor Fit for Today's Teacher Workforce | TeacherPensions.org

As many have said, the job is demanding and just made worse by parents and crappy administrators. My wife is a teacher and I hear all of the stories on how they can't touch a kid even when they go off the deep end. One school had to call the police on a second grader because the parents refused to come to the school and deal with their child.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-30-2016, 09:57 AM
 
4,901 posts, read 8,763,892 times
Reputation: 7117
Quote:
Originally Posted by BizrulesSD View Post
New teachers are definitely underpaid but on the flip side experienced teachers make can easily crack 100K.
Only in areas with a high cost of living, where $100K doesn't go as far as you'd think it would.

My husband has nearly 30 years of experience and only just in the last couple of years made it to $50,000....and that's including a couple of yearly bonuses based on county sales taxes, which fluctuate.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-30-2016, 10:43 AM
 
Location: My beloved Bluegrass
20,127 posts, read 16,179,285 times
Reputation: 28336
Quote:
Originally Posted by Coney View Post
I will add that teachers in my area have additional sick days when they are injured on the job by a student. It's not part of worker's compensation. There is a limit of days before the teacher files for worker's comp. I was assaulted twice, once having to take off a few days for medical care and recovery. Teachers are also eligible for free psychological counseling when this happens.
In Kentucky any days missed as a result of a student assault are covered 100%, as they should be.
__________________
When I post in bold red that is moderator action and, per the TOS, can only be discussed through Direct Message.Moderator - Diabetes and Kentucky (including Lexington & Louisville)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-30-2016, 11:40 AM
 
16,825 posts, read 17,748,959 times
Reputation: 20852
Quote:
Originally Posted by BizrulesSD View Post
New teachers are definitely underpaid but on the flip side experienced teachers make can easily crack 100K. Furthermore, their retirement is a joke. It is very back end heavy and most teachers don't get close to a full pension. Overall, I think it is a fair deal.

source Antiquated Pension Plans Are A Poor Fit for Today's Teacher Workforce | TeacherPensions.org

As many have said, the job is demanding and just made worse by parents and crappy administrators. My wife is a teacher and I hear all of the stories on how they can't touch a kid even when they go off the deep end. One school had to call the police on a second grader because the parents refused to come to the school and deal with their child.
I teach in one of the highest paying states when it comes to teacher salaries. Only a handful of districts have a teaching guide that goes above $100k for teaching. If someone becomes an administrator or department chair, or takes on a bunch of clubs or stipended extracurriculars much more likely but "just" teaching, not common enough to say they "easily crack $100k".
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-30-2016, 11:54 AM
 
Location: Oregon, formerly Texas
10,074 posts, read 7,250,903 times
Reputation: 17146
If you've never experienced the misery of grading... you've never been a teacher and understand nothing.

The act of "teaching" - meaning doing the actual performance - is the easy part of being a teacher. It's the fun part, the creative part, the part we see as students. As a student, you don't see any of the back-end work.

I'd put teaching on par with legal work for the amount of mundane & time-consuming banality that goes on in the back-end. And lawyers get paid a heck of a lot more than teachers, and are far more respected.

That's without taking any discipline issues into account, which others already have.

My wife has a "normal" professional job. No, her job does not follow her home like teaching does. She has to put in more direct office time, but long story short, what happens at work stays at work. Not so with teaching. All the grading and the planning has to take place during off-hours. It can be life-consuming if you let it. I've seen enthusiastic young teachers literally do nothing but work, and of course they wash out in 3 years or less. No one can stand that stress for long.

As far as they're paid, considering they're on 10 month contracts, I think it's okay, but not for those districts who pay like $30k to start. Teachers everywhere should be paid 40-45k to start at least. I'd say the end of career top-out should be around $85-90k. Experienced teachers really are much, MUCH better than new ones. It takes 3-5 years just to get the ropes down and learn what works for the individual teacher. I would be fine with extending the school year to a full year, and paying teachers accordingly for a 12 month contract.

Last edited by redguard57; 11-30-2016 at 12:04 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-30-2016, 02:47 PM
 
280 posts, read 250,584 times
Reputation: 351
Quote:
Originally Posted by redguard57 View Post
]

As far as they're paid, considering they're on 10 month contracts, I think it's okay, but not for those districts who pay like $30k to start. Teachers everywhere should be paid 40-45k to start at least. I'd say the end of career top-out should be around $85-90k. Experienced teachers really are much, MUCH better than new ones. It takes 3-5 years just to get the ropes down and learn what works for the individual teacher. I would be fine with extending the school year to a full year, and paying teachers accordingly for a 12 month contract.
I don't get how teachers can start at 30K. That is terrible.

The experienced teacher argument is an interesting one. When my wife started teaching 4 years ago, she was worried the parents would be all over her for being a new teacher and request to pull the kids out of her class. What happened is that she had parents begging her to move their kids INTO her class. One of the other experienced teachers was terrible and everyone knew it. Furthermore, as she moved into year 4, she is spending significantly less time prepping lessons. The joys of a union and teacher tenure.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-30-2016, 03:12 PM
 
Location: Oregon, formerly Texas
10,074 posts, read 7,250,903 times
Reputation: 17146
Quote:
Originally Posted by BizrulesSD View Post
I don't get how teachers can start at 30K. That is terrible.

The experienced teacher argument is an interesting one. When my wife started teaching 4 years ago, she was worried the parents would be all over her for being a new teacher and request to pull the kids out of her class. What happened is that she had parents begging her to move their kids INTO her class. One of the other experienced teachers was terrible and everyone knew it. Furthermore, as she moved into year 4, she is spending significantly less time prepping lessons. The joys of a union and teacher tenure.
Maybe she's naturally good, which some people are. Some people are naturally good with kids and hold their attention. Others need more practice. In my experience, seasoned teachers always have better control.

You said she's on year 4, which is about the point you know what you're doing enough that it doesn't take all your time.

Like I said, teaching has a performance aspect, and like actors, some are better than others. That doesn't mean that studios should fire all actors because they are all not academy award winners.

I don't know what was wrong with the teacher you're referring to.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-30-2016, 03:14 PM
 
Location: On the Chesapeake
45,455 posts, read 60,666,498 times
Reputation: 61073
Quote:
Originally Posted by BizrulesSD View Post
I don't get how teachers can start at 30K. That is terrible.

The experienced teacher argument is an interesting one. When my wife started teaching 4 years ago, she was worried the parents would be all over her for being a new teacher and request to pull the kids out of her class. What happened is that she had parents begging her to move their kids INTO her class. One of the other experienced teachers was terrible and everyone knew it. Furthermore, as she moved into year 4, she is spending significantly less time prepping lessons. The joys of a union and teacher tenure.
Just going to ask how her gaining more experience and skill developing lessons interacts with the "joys of a union and teacher tenure"?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-30-2016, 03:38 PM
 
Location: Suburbia
8,827 posts, read 15,329,864 times
Reputation: 4533
Quote:
Originally Posted by phetaroi View Post
I don't understand that comment.
You wrote, "...districts compete with each other for good teacher through benefits".

I agree. Our benefits and pay are lagging behind surrounding districts. So, that is why I wrote, "That's probably why we have so many unfilled teaching positions".
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-30-2016, 03:42 PM
 
Location: Suburbia
8,827 posts, read 15,329,864 times
Reputation: 4533
Quote:
Originally Posted by redguard57 View Post

Teachers everywhere should be paid 40-45k to start at least. I'd say the end of career top-out should be around $85-90k. Experienced teachers really are much, MUCH better than new ones. It takes 3-5 years just to get the ropes down and learn what works for the individual teacher.
I don't think you can put a blanket pay range like that and say teachers everywhere should get that amount. It's been mentioned before. The COL has to be considered.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Education > Teaching

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top